Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Resuscitation. 2021 May;162:381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
To examine incidence and outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac (OHCA) arrest in a high-risk area characterised by high density of potential bystanders and easy access to nearby automated external defibrillators (AEDs).
This retrospective observational study investigated pre-hospital and in-hospital treatment, as well as survival amongst persons with OHCA at Copenhagen International Airport between May 25, 2015 and May 25, 2019. OHCA data from pre- and in-hospital medical records were obtained and compared with public bystander witnessed OHCAs in Denmark.
Of the 23 identified non-traumatic OHCAs, 91.3% were witnessed by bystanders, 73.9% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 43.5% were defibrillated by a bystander. Survival to hospital discharge was 56.5%, with 100% survival among persons with an initial shockable heart rhythm. Compared with nationwide bystander witnessed OHCAs, persons with OHCA at the airport were less likely to receive bystander CPR (73.9% vs. 89.4%, OR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86), more likely to receive bystander defibrillation (43.5% vs. 24.8%, OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.01-5.31), to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (78.2% vs. 50.6%, OR 3.51; 95% CI, 1.30-9.49), and survive to hospital discharge (56.5% vs. 45.2%, OR 1.58; 95% CI, 0.69-3.62).
We found a high proportion of bystander defibrillation indicating that bystanders will quickly apply an AED, when accessible. Importantly, 56% of all persons, and all persons with a shockable heart rhythm survived. These findings suggest increased potential for survival following OHCA and support current guidelines to strategically deploy accessible AEDs in high-risk OHCA areas.
在一个潜在旁观者密度高且易于获得附近自动体外除颤器(AED)的高风险地区,研究院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的发生率和结局。
本回顾性观察研究调查了 2015 年 5 月 25 日至 2019 年 5 月 25 日期间哥本哈根国际机场发生的非创伤性 OHCA 患者的院前和院内治疗情况,以及生存情况。从院前和院内病历中获得 OHCA 数据,并与丹麦有旁观者见证的 OHCA 进行比较。
在 23 例确定的非创伤性 OHCA 中,91.3%由旁观者见证,73.9%接受旁观者心肺复苏(CPR),43.5%由旁观者除颤。存活至出院的比例为 56.5%,初始可电击心律的患者 100%存活。与全国范围内有旁观者见证的 OHCA 相比,机场 OHCA 患者接受旁观者 CPR 的可能性较小(73.9% vs. 89.4%,OR 0.33;95%CI,0.13-0.86),更有可能接受旁观者除颤(43.5% vs. 24.8%,OR 2.32;95%CI,1.01-5.31),实现自主循环恢复(78.2% vs. 50.6%,OR 3.51;95%CI,1.30-9.49),并存活至出院(56.5% vs. 45.2%,OR 1.58;95%CI,0.69-3.62)。
我们发现旁观者除颤的比例很高,这表明在可获得 AED 的情况下,旁观者会迅速应用 AED。重要的是,所有患者中有 56%,以及所有有可电击心律的患者都存活下来。这些发现表明 OHCA 后存活的可能性增加,并支持当前在高风险 OHCA 地区战略性部署可及 AED 的指南。