Xie Xian-Qiong, Cai Dong-Gui, Yang Quan
Honghu Municipal People's Hospital.
Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou, Hubei, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 12;100(6):e23305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023305.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) rs6265 polymorphism has been previously suggested to be associated with the susceptibility of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but results remained controversial. We aim to provide a more reliable conclusion about the association between BDNF rs6265 polymorphism and T2DM risk by using a meta-analysis.
Electronic databases such as Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched for relevant articles published up to May 06, 2020. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the strength of the associations. Subgroup analysis was carried out according to source of controls and quality score of included studies. A trial sequential analysis was conducted to reduce the risk of type I error.
A total of 8 case-control studies (7 conducted in China) with 1576 T2DM patients and 1866 controls were included. Overall, our results indicated no significant association between BDNF rs6265 polymorphism and T2DM risk with the random-effects model (allele model: pooled OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.79-1.65, homozygote model: pooled OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.57-2.21, heterozygote model: pooled OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.78-1.48, dominant model: pooled OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.74-1.75 and recessive model: pooled OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.67-1.80). Subgroup analysis by source of controls and quality score also showed no significant association between BDNF rs6265 polymorphism and T2DM risk. Trial sequential analysis results confirmed the null association and further studies were unnecessary.
This meta-analysis study indicated that no significant association between BDNF rs6265 polymorphism and T2DM risk.
脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)rs6265多态性先前被认为与2型糖尿病(T2DM)的易感性相关,但结果仍存在争议。我们旨在通过荟萃分析得出关于BDNF rs6265多态性与T2DM风险之间关联的更可靠结论。
检索了诸如Pubmed、Embase、中国知网和万方等电子数据库,以查找截至2020年5月6日发表的相关文章。采用合并比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)来评估关联强度。根据对照来源和纳入研究的质量评分进行亚组分析。进行了试验序贯分析以降低I型错误风险。
共纳入8项病例对照研究(7项在中国进行),涉及1576例T2DM患者和1866例对照。总体而言,我们的结果表明,在随机效应模型下,BDNF rs6265多态性与T2DM风险之间无显著关联(等位基因模型:合并OR = 1.14,95% CI = 0.79 - 1.65;纯合子模型:合并OR = 1.13,95% CI = 0.57 - 2.21;杂合子模型:合并OR = 1.07,95% CI = 0.78 - 1.48;显性模型:合并OR = 1.14,95% CI = 0.74 - 1.75;隐性模型:合并OR = 1.10,95% CI = 0.67 - 1.80)。按对照来源和质量评分进行的亚组分析也显示BDNF rs6265多态性与T2DM风险之间无显著关联。试验序贯分析结果证实了无关联,无需进一步研究。
这项荟萃分析研究表明BDNF rs6265多态性与T2DM风险之间无显著关联。