Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Christchurch Clinical Studies Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):969-975. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2250. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
To study the MiniMed Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) system, which includes an algorithm with individualized basal target set points, automated correction bolus function, and improved Auto Mode stability.
This dual-center, randomized, open-label, two-sequence crossover study in automated-insulin-delivery-naive participants with type 1 diabetes (aged 7-80 years) compared AHCL to sensor-augmented pump therapy with predictive low glucose management (SAP + PLGM). Each study phase was 4 weeks, preceded by a 2- to 4-week run-in and separated by a 2-week washout.
The study was completed by 59 of 60 people (mean age 23.3 ± 14.4 years). Time in target range (TIR) 3.9-10 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) favored AHCL over SAP + PLGM (70.4 ± 8.1% vs. 57.9 ± 11.7%) by 12.5 ± 8.5% ( < 0.001), with greater improvement overnight (18.8 ± 12.9%, < 0.001). All age-groups (children [7-13 years], adolescents [14-21 years], and adults [>22 years]) demonstrated improvement, with adolescents showing the largest improvement (14.4 ± 8.4%). Mean sensor glucose (SG) at run-in was 9.3 ± 0.9 mmol/L (167 ± 16.2 mg/dL) and improved with AHCL (8.5 ± 0.7 mmol/L [153 ± 12.6 mg/dL], < 0.001), but deteriorated during PLGM (9.5 ± 1.1 mmol/L [17 ± 19.8 mg/dL], < 0.001). TIR was optimal when the algorithm set point was 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) compared with 6.7 mmol/L (120 mg/dL), 72.0 ± 7.9% vs. 64.6 ± 6.9%, respectively, with no additional hypoglycemia. Auto Mode was active 96.4 ± 4.0% of the time. The percentage of hypoglycemia at baseline (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL] and ≤3.0 mmol/L [54 mg/dL]) was 3.1 ± 2.1% and 0.5 ± 0.6%, respectively. During AHCL, the percentage time at <3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) improved to 2.1 ± 1.4% ( = 0.034) and was statistically but not clinically reduced for ≤3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) (0.5 ± 0.5%; = 0.025). There was one episode of mild diabetic ketoacidosis attributed to an infusion set failure in combination with an intercurrent illness, which occurred during the SAP + PLGM arm.
AHCL with automated correction bolus demonstrated significant improvement in glucose control compared with SAP + PLGM. A lower algorithm SG set point during AHCL resulted in greater TIR, with no increase in hypoglycemia.
研究 MiniMed 高级混合闭环 (AHCL) 系统,该系统包括具有个体化基础目标设定点、自动校正推注功能和改进的 Auto 模式稳定性的算法。
这项在自动化胰岛素输送初治的 1 型糖尿病患者(年龄 7-80 岁)中进行的双中心、随机、开放标签、两序列交叉研究,将 AHCL 与具有预测性低血糖管理的传感器增强泵治疗 (SAP + PLGM) 进行比较。每个研究阶段持续 4 周,在进入研究前有 2-4 周的洗脱期,在两个研究阶段之间有 2 周的洗脱期。
共有 60 人中有 59 人(平均年龄 23.3 ± 14.4 岁)完成了研究。TIR 3.9-10mmol/L(70-180mg/dL)时,AHCL 优于 SAP + PLGM(70.4 ± 8.1%比 57.9 ± 11.7%),优势为 12.5 ± 8.5%(<0.001),夜间改善更大(18.8 ± 12.9%,<0.001)。所有年龄组(儿童[7-13 岁]、青少年[14-21 岁]和成年人[>22 岁])均有改善,青少年改善最大(14.4 ± 8.4%)。AHCL 治疗前的平均传感器血糖(SG)为 9.3 ± 0.9mmol/L(167 ± 16.2mg/dL),并有所改善(8.5 ± 0.7mmol/L [153 ± 12.6mg/dL],<0.001),但在 PLGM 期间恶化(9.5 ± 1.1mmol/L [17 ± 19.8mg/dL],<0.001)。与 6.7mmol/L(120mg/dL)相比,算法设定点为 5.6mmol/L(100mg/dL)时,TIR 更优,分别为 72.0 ± 7.9%和 64.6 ± 6.9%,且无额外低血糖。Auto 模式的活跃时间为 96.4 ± 4.0%。基线时(<3.9mmol/L [70mg/dL]和≤3.0mmol/L [54mg/dL])的低血糖百分比分别为 3.1 ± 2.1%和 0.5 ± 0.6%。在 AHCL 期间,<3.9mmol/L(70mg/dL)的时间百分比改善至 2.1 ± 1.4%(=0.034),且对于≤3.0mmol/L(54mg/dL),统计学上但临床上有所减少(0.5 ± 0.5%;=0.025)。在 SAP + PLGM 臂期间,有 1 例轻度糖尿病酮症酸中毒与输注套件故障合并并发疾病有关。
与 SAP + PLGM 相比,具有自动校正推注功能的 AHCL 可显著改善血糖控制。AHCL 中较低的算法 SG 设定点可导致更大的 TIR,且不会增加低血糖。