Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 May;69(5):1334-1342. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17056. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Evaluations of complex models of care for older adults may benefit from simultaneous assessment of intervention implementation. The STRIDE (Strategies To Reduce Injuries and Develop confidence in Elders) pragmatic trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce serious fall injuries in older adults. We conducted multi-level stakeholder interviews to identify barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation and understand efforts taken to mitigate these barriers.
Qualitative interviews with key informants.
Ten clinical trial sites affiliated with practices that provided primary care for persons at increased risk for fall injuries.
Specially trained registered nurses working as Falls Care Managers (FCMs) who delivered the intervention (n = 13 individual interviews), Research Staff who supervised trial implementation locally (n = 10 group interviews, 23 included individuals), and members of Central Project Management and the National Patient Stakeholder Council who oversaw national implementation (n = 2 group interviews, six included individuals).
A semi-structured interview guide derived from the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).
We identified eight key barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation. FCMs navigated complex relationships with patients and families while working with Research Staff to implement the intervention in primary care practices with limited clinical space, variable provider buy-in, and significant primary care practice staff and provider turnover. The costs of the intervention to individual patients and medical practices amplified these barriers. Efforts to mitigate these barriers varied depending on the needs and opportunities of each primary care setting.
The many barriers to implementation and the variability in how stakeholders addressed these locally may have affected the overall STRIDE intervention's effectiveness. Future pragmatic trials should incorporate simultaneous implementation aims to better understand how research interventions translate into clinical care that improves the lives of older adults.
背景/目的:评估老年人复杂的护理模式可能受益于同时评估干预措施的实施情况。STRIDE(减少老年人伤害和增强信心的策略)实用试验评估了一种多因素干预措施,以减少老年人严重跌倒伤害的效果。我们进行了多层次利益相关者访谈,以确定 STRIDE 干预实施的障碍,并了解为减轻这些障碍而采取的措施。
对主要知情人进行定性访谈。
十个与为有跌倒受伤风险的人提供初级保健的实践有关的临床试验地点。
经过专门培训的注册护士,担任跌倒护理经理(FCM),提供干预措施(n=13 次个人访谈);在当地监督试验实施的研究人员(n=10 次小组访谈,23 人包括在内);以及监督国家实施的中央项目管理和国家患者利益相关者委员会成员(n=2 次小组访谈,6 人包括在内)。
源自实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的半结构化访谈指南。
我们确定了 STRIDE 干预实施的八个关键障碍。FCM 在与患者和家属建立复杂关系的同时,与研究人员合作,在临床空间有限、提供者参与程度不一、主要医疗保健实践人员和提供者更替频繁的初级保健实践中实施干预措施。对个别患者和医疗实践的干预成本放大了这些障碍。减轻这些障碍的努力因每个初级保健环境的需求和机会而异。
实施的许多障碍以及利益相关者在解决这些障碍时的差异,可能会影响 STRIDE 干预措施的整体效果。未来的实用试验应同时纳入实施目标,以更好地了解研究干预措施如何转化为改善老年人生活的临床护理。