• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

载药二氧化硅组装体改善根管封闭剂的抗菌性能。

Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Improve Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):793-799. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.003
PMID:33582178
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity and flow of root canal sealers after incorporating novel highly loaded antimicrobial drug-silica coassembled particles (DSPs).

METHODS

DSPs were synthesized through coassembly of silica and octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) antimicrobial surfactant. DSPs were loaded (1% and 2% wt) into epoxy resin sealer (AH Plus [AH]; Dentsply DeTrey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) or calcium silicate-based sealer (EndoSequence Bioceramic Sealer (BC); Brasseler, Savannah, GA). OCT release from DSP-modified sealers was determined using liquid chromatography. Antimicrobial activity of sealers against planktonic or biofilm form Enterococcus faecalis was assessed using direct contact and membrane restricted tests. Sealer flow was tested according to ISO6876:2012.

RESULTS

OCT release from BC + 1% or 2% DSPs was above the minimum inhibitory concentration following 2 days throughout the 30-day experiment, whereas OCT release from AH + 1% or 2% DSP was significantly below the minimum inhibitory concentration against E. faecalis (4 μg/mL) over the whole 30-day experimental period. All materials (with or without DSPs) killed planktonic bacteria initially. AH ± 1% or 2% DSPs had no antimicrobial activity after 7 days. BC + 1% or 2% DSPs maintained antibacterial activity over the 30-day period. Both modified and unmodified sealers completely inhibited the growth of E. faecalis biofilms after 24 hours of contact. DSPs decreased the flow of AH and BC sealers; for AH, the reduction was proportional to the amount of DSPs added. All modified and unmodified sealers, except for AH + 2% DSPs, were within the acceptable limits of ISO 6876 flow tests.

CONCLUSIONS

DSPs enhanced the antimicrobial performance of BC but not AH, whereas the material's flow remained compliant with ISO 6876 standards. Depending on the sealer, DSPs may enhance antimicrobial efficacy in root canal treatment and potentially improve treatment outcome.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估新型高载抗菌药物-硅共组装颗粒(DSPs)掺入根管封闭剂后的抗菌活性和流动性能。

方法

通过硅和盐酸奥替尼啶(OCT)抗菌表面活性剂的共组装合成 DSPs。将 DSPs(1%和 2%wt)负载到环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus [AH];Dentsply DeTrey GmbH,康斯坦茨,德国)或硅酸钙基封闭剂(EndoSequence 生物陶瓷封闭剂(BC);Brasseler,萨凡纳,GA)中。使用液相色谱法测定 DSP 改性封闭剂中 OCT 的释放情况。使用直接接触和膜限制试验评估封闭剂对浮游或生物膜形式粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。根据 ISO6876:2012 测试封闭剂的流动性能。

结果

在整个 30 天实验过程中,BC+1%或 2%DSPs 中的 OCT 释放量在第 2 天超过最低抑菌浓度(MIC)4μg/ml,而 AH+1%或 2%DSPs 中的 OCT 释放量在整个 30 天实验过程中均明显低于 MIC。所有材料(带或不带 DSPs)最初都能杀死浮游细菌。AH±1%或 2%DSPs 在第 7 天无抗菌活性。BC+1%或 2%DSPs 在 30 天内保持抗菌活性。改性和未改性的封闭剂在接触 24 小时后均可完全抑制粪肠球菌生物膜的生长。DSPs 降低了 AH 和 BC 封闭剂的流动性;对于 AH,减少量与添加的 DSPs 量成正比。除 AH+2%DSPs 外,所有改性和未改性的封闭剂均符合 ISO6876 流动测试的可接受标准。

结论

DSPs 增强了 BC 的抗菌性能,但对 AH 没有增强,而材料的流动性能仍符合 ISO6876 标准。根据封闭剂的不同,DSPs 可能会增强根管治疗中的抗菌效果,并可能改善治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Improve Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers.载药二氧化硅组装体改善根管封闭剂的抗菌性能。
J Endod. 2021 May;47(5):793-799. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
2
Assessment of Root Canal Sealers Loaded with Drug-Silica Coassembled Particles Using an In Vitro Tooth Model.载药-硅共聚组装体的根管封闭剂的体外牙模型评估。
J Endod. 2021 Nov;47(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.牙本质可增强根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2014 Apr;40(4):505-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.042. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
4
Comparative Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Two Bioceramic Sealers.两种生物陶瓷封固剂的比较生物相容性和成骨潜力。
J Endod. 2019 Jan;45(1):51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.007.
5
In vitro evaluation of antibacterial effect of AH Plus incorporated with quaternary ammonium epoxy silicate against Enterococcus faecalis.含季铵环氧硅酸盐的AH Plus对粪肠球菌抗菌效果的体外评价
J Endod. 2014 Oct;40(10):1611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 May 5.
6
Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Endodontic Sealers on Intratubular Penetration and Bond Strength to Root Dentin.超声激活根管封闭剂对根管内渗透性和与牙本质粘结强度的影响。
J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9):1302-1308. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis.比较硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌活性:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析。
Odontology. 2019 Oct;107(4):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00425-7. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
The Antimicrobial Effect of Bioceramic Sealer on an 8-week Matured Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Attached to Root Canal Dentinal Surface.生物陶瓷密封剂对附着在根管牙本质表面的 8 周成熟粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用。
J Endod. 2019 Aug;45(8):1047-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Antibacterial Activity of a New Ready-To-Use Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer.一种新型即用型硅酸钙基封闭剂的抗菌活性
Braz Dent J. 2020 Nov-Dec;31(6):611-616. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202003870.
10
The effect of benzalkonium chloride additions to AH Plus sealer. Antimicrobial, physical and chemical properties.向AH Plus封闭剂中添加苯扎氯铵的效果。抗菌、物理和化学性质。
J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):846-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
2
Influence of bioceramic sealers on dentinal tubule penetration and antimicrobial effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.生物陶瓷封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透和抗菌效果的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):672-699. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00904-6. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Bioceramics in Endodontics: Updates and Future Perspectives.
牙髓病学中的生物陶瓷:最新进展与未来展望
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;10(3):354. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030354.
4
Bioactivity Potential of Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Scoping Review.基于生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的生物活性潜力:一项范围综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;12(11):1853. doi: 10.3390/life12111853.
5
Present status and future directions: Hydraulic materials for endodontic use.现状与未来方向:牙髓用液压材料。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):710-777. doi: 10.1111/iej.13709. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial effect of four root canal sealers on dental biofilms.体外评价四种根管封闭剂对牙菌斑生物膜的抗菌效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4361-4368. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04399-9. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Properties of Bioceramic Materials in Endodontics.生物陶瓷材料在牙髓病学中的抗菌和抗生物膜特性
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;14(24):7594. doi: 10.3390/ma14247594.