Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗联合同期放化疗治疗鼻咽癌:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。

Induction chemotherapy plus concomitant chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Osteoncology and Rare Tumors Center, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.

Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Apr;160:103244. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103244. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy (IC) added to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) appears to be superior to CCRT alone for locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The main objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to assess the impact of different IC regimens on patient outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically searched and extracted data from randomized, controlled trials involving stage III-IV NPC patients randomly assigned to receive IC + CCRT vs. CCRT alone. Overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in the two arms were compared using hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Eight clinical trials were identified including 2362 patients. OS-benefit from doublet IC regimens, in particular platinum-docetaxel and platinum-gemcitabine regimens, was seen. With regard to LRFS, docetaxel-platinum-5FU regimen showed a greater impact than the others. An indirect comparison between taxane- and gemcitabine-based IC regimens showed a benefit of the latter in terms of OS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CCRT with cisplatin has been the gold standard of treatment in NPC for several years. Docetaxel + cisplatin-IC and cisplatin + gemcitabine-IC regimens have a positive impact on survival in locally-advanced NPC and should be considered the new standard option.

摘要

背景

诱导化疗(IC)联合同期放化疗(CCRT)似乎优于单纯 CCRT 治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)的主要目的是评估不同 IC 方案对患者结局的影响。

患者和方法

我们系统地检索并提取了涉及 III-IV 期 NPC 患者的随机对照试验数据,这些患者被随机分配接受 IC+CCRT 与单纯 CCRT。使用风险比(HRs)比较了两组患者的总生存(OS)、无局部区域复发生存(LRFS)和无远处转移生存(DMFS)。

结果

共纳入 8 项临床试验,包括 2362 例患者。与单纯 CCRT 相比,双联 IC 方案,特别是铂类-多西他赛和铂类-吉西他滨方案,具有 OS 获益。在 LRFS 方面,多西他赛-铂-5FU 方案比其他方案的影响更大。紫杉烷类和吉西他滨类 IC 方案的间接比较显示,后者在 OS 和 DMFS 方面具有优势。

结论

虽然顺铂 CCRT 已成为 NPC 多年来的标准治疗方法,但多西他赛+顺铂 IC 和顺铂+吉西他滨 IC 方案对局部晚期 NPC 的生存有积极影响,应被视为新的标准治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验