Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, TRNC, Turkey.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, TRNC, Turkey.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 May;117:104381. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104381. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
The aim of this study is to assess the stress distribution of a nanoceramic resin CAD/CAM material, Lava Ultimate (LU) and a polymer-infiltrated hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM material, Vita Enamic (VE) for enamel replacement for Nayyar core (corono-radicular dowel and core) or post-retained restoration designs of a maxillary first premolar tooth with missing palatal cusp.
A three dimensional finite element (FE) modelof maxillary first premolar with two roots was modeled. A mesial-occlusal-distal-palatal (MODP) cavity was designed with cavity floor above cemento-enamel junction and including buccal cuspal reduction. Restoration designs consisted of Nayyar core restoration (NCR) and post-retained restoration (PRR) with a glass fiber post. Vita Enamic (VE), Lava Ultimate (LU) were used for enamel and everX Posterior was used for dentin replacement. Vertical occlusal load (100 N) was applied on a spherical solid rigid material simulating the food stuff. Von Mises (VM) and maximum principle stress values were evaluated separately for the remaining enamel, remaining dentin and restorative material in megapascal (MPa).
The analysis of both VM and maximum principle stress values revealed that the most intense stress accumulation was in the cervical region of enamel for both designs. For VM, similar stress values were observed only in dentin. Stress analysis of restorative materials showed that everX Posterior had the highest stress accumulation.
The comparison of the two techniques showed that PRR had better stress distribution than NCR. NCR or PRR with LU or VE exhibited similar VM stress accumulation in dentin. Maximum principle stress analyses showed that PRR with LU transmitted the least stress to enamel and dentin indicating that when LU is the material of choice, post-retained restoration would be a satisfactory design. VM stress values of enamel revealed that VE absorbed the stress in itself and transferred less stress to dentin. This could point out that for the restoration of maxillary first premolar tooth with missing palatal cusp, VE may be a suitable material for NCR and PRR restoration techniques.
When fiber reinforced composite is used as dentin replacement in combination with VE as enamel replacement; any technique; PRR or NCR, may be preferred in the restoration of MODP cavities of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. The clinical relevance has to be further studied in-vivo.
本研究旨在评估纳米陶瓷树脂 CAD/CAM 材料 Lava Ultimate(LU)和聚合物渗透混合陶瓷 CAD/CAM 材料 Vita Enamic(VE)用于替代釉质的应力分布,以修复上颌第一前磨牙缺失腭尖的 Nayyar 核(根-冠向嵌体和核)或桩核保留修复设计。
对具有两个根的上颌第一前磨牙进行三维有限元(FE)建模。设计近中-颊舌-腭(MODP)腔,腔底位于牙骨质-釉质交界处上方,包括颊尖减径。修复设计包括 Nayyar 核修复(NCR)和桩核保留修复(PRR),并用玻璃纤维桩。Vita Enamic(VE)、Lava Ultimate(LU)用于替代釉质,everX Posterior 用于替代牙本质。在模拟食物的球形刚性材料上施加 100N 的垂直咬合载荷。在兆帕斯卡(MPa)下分别评估剩余釉质、剩余牙本质和修复材料的 Von Mises(VM)和最大主应力值。
VM 和最大主应力值的分析表明,两种设计中,最强烈的应力集中都在上颌第一前磨牙的颈部。对于 VM,仅在牙本质中观察到相似的应力值。修复材料的应力分析表明,everX Posterior 具有最高的应力积累。
两种技术的比较表明,PRR 比 NCR 具有更好的应力分布。NCR 或 PRR 与 LU 或 VE 具有相似的 VM 牙本质应力积累。最大主应力分析表明,PRR 与 LU 向釉质和牙本质传递的应力最小,表明当 LU 是首选材料时,桩核保留修复是一种令人满意的设计。VM 釉质的应力值表明,VE 本身吸收了应力,并将较少的应力传递给牙本质。这可能表明,对于上颌第一前磨牙缺失腭尖的修复,VE 可能是 NCR 和 PRR 修复技术的合适材料。
当纤维增强复合材料作为牙本质替代物与作为釉质替代物的 VE 联合使用时;任何技术;PRR 或 NCR,在修复牙髓治疗上颌前磨牙的 MODP 腔时都可能是首选。其临床相关性还需要进一步的体内研究。