Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021 Aug;11(8):1235-1248. doi: 10.1002/alr.22777. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from non-odontogenic rhinosinusitis, and often requires multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers to make the diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to develop international multidisciplinary consensus on diagnosing ODS.
A modified Delphi method was used to assess for expert consensus on diagnosing bacterial ODS. A multidisciplinary panel of 17 authors with ODS expertise from 8 countries (8 otolaryngologists, 9 dental specialists) was assembled. Each author completed 2 of 3 surveys (2 specialty-specific, and 1 for all authors). Thirty-seven clinical statements were created, focusing on 4 important diagnostic components: suspecting ODS; confirming sinusitis in ODS; confirming different dental pathologies causing ODS; and multidisciplinary collaborative aspects of diagnosing ODS. Target audiences were all otolaryngologists and dental providers.
Of the 37 clinical statements, 36 reached consensus or strong consensus, and 1 reached no consensus. Strong consensus was reached that certain clinical and microbiologic features should arouse suspicion for ODS, and that multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers is generally required to diagnose ODS. To diagnose ODS, otolaryngologists should confirm sinusitis mainly based on nasal endoscopic findings of middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps, and dental providers should confirm dental pathology based on clinical examination and dental imaging.
Based on multidisciplinary international consensus, diagnosing ODS generally requires otolaryngologists to confirm sinusitis, and dental providers to confirm maxillary odontogenic pathology. Importantly, both dental providers and otolaryngologists should suspect ODS based on certain clinical features, and refer patients to appropriate providers for disease confirmation.
牙源性鼻窦炎(ODS)与非牙源性鼻窦炎不同,通常需要耳鼻喉科医生和牙科医生之间的多学科合作来做出诊断。本研究的目的是制定国际多学科共识,以诊断 ODS。
使用改良 Delphi 法评估专家对诊断细菌性 ODS 的共识。来自 8 个国家的 17 名 ODS 专家(8 名耳鼻喉科医生,9 名牙科专家)组成了一个多学科小组。每位作者完成了 3 项调查中的 2 项(2 项专业特定调查和 1 项所有作者的调查)。创建了 37 个临床陈述,重点关注 4 个重要的诊断组成部分:怀疑 ODS;确认 ODS 中的鼻窦炎;确认导致 ODS 的不同牙科病变;以及诊断 ODS 的多学科协作方面。目标受众是所有耳鼻喉科医生和牙科医生。
在 37 个临床陈述中,有 36 个达到了共识或强烈共识,有 1 个未达成共识。强烈共识是,某些临床和微生物学特征应该引起对 ODS 的怀疑,耳鼻喉科医生和牙科医生之间的多学科合作通常需要诊断 ODS。为了诊断 ODS,耳鼻喉科医生主要应根据中鼻甲脓性、水肿或息肉的鼻内窥镜检查结果来确认鼻窦炎,而牙科医生应根据临床检查和牙科成像来确认牙科病理学。
基于多学科国际共识,诊断 ODS 通常需要耳鼻喉科医生确认鼻窦炎,而牙科医生确认上颌牙源性病变。重要的是,牙科医生和耳鼻喉科医生都应根据某些临床特征怀疑 ODS,并将患者转介给合适的医生进行疾病确认。