Department of Comparative Diagnostic and Population Medicine, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Comparative Diagnostic and Population Medicine, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2021 Mar;48(2):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
To develop an ultrasound-guided approach to intercostal nerve injection and to compare the success rate of intercostal nerve injections using blind or ultrasound-guided technique in canine cadavers.
Prospective, randomized, descriptive, experimental anatomic study.
A total of 14 mid-sized adult canine cadavers.
Ultrasound landmarks were identified by dissection of four cadavers and used to develop an ultrasound-guided technique. The remaining 10 cadavers were randomly assigned to blind (five cadavers) or ultrasound-guided (five cadavers) injections of the third to the ninth intercostal nerves bilaterally with 0.03 mL kg of colorant per injection. The target for intercostal injections was the caudal border of the respective rib, between the internal intercostal membrane and the parietal pleura. Additionally, displacement of the parietal pleura without visible intramuscular distribution was considered the end point for ultrasound-guided injections. For each cadaver, a practitioner in training performed the blocks on one hemithorax, while an experienced practitioner performed the blocks on the opposite hemithorax. Injections were considered successful if ≥1 cm of the target nerve was stained with colorant upon dissection. Success rates and length of nerve staining were analyzed with Fisher's exact and t tests, respectively. Data were considered statistically different with p < 0.05.
Success rates of blind and ultrasound-guided technique were 57.1% and 91.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The length of intercostal nerve staining was 3.1 ± 1.2 cm and 3.6 ± 1.0 cm using blind and ultrasound-guided techniques, respectively (p = 0.02). No differences were observed between the two practitioners for blind (p = 0.33) and ultrasound-guided techniques (p = 0.67).
Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of intercostal nerve injections when compared with blind technique, independently of the level of expertise in regional anesthesia.
开发一种肋间神经超声引导注射方法,并比较在犬尸体中使用盲法或超声引导技术进行肋间神经注射的成功率。
前瞻性、随机、描述性、实验解剖研究。
总共 14 只中型成年犬尸体。
通过对 4 具尸体进行解剖,确定了超声标志,并将其用于开发超声引导技术。其余 10 具尸体随机分为盲法(5 具尸体)或超声引导(5 具尸体)双侧第三至第九肋间神经注射,每侧注射 0.03ml/kg 染色剂。肋间神经注射的目标是相应肋骨的尾侧缘,位于肋间内膜和壁胸膜之间。此外,当可见胸膜移位而无可见的肌内分布时,被认为是超声引导注射的终点。对于每具尸体,一名受训医师在一侧胸腔进行阻滞,而一名经验丰富的医师在另一侧胸腔进行阻滞。如果在解剖时目标神经染色≥1cm,则认为注射成功。使用 Fisher 精确检验和 t 检验分别分析成功率和神经染色长度。数据差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
盲法和超声引导技术的成功率分别为 57.1%和 91.4%(p<0.0001)。盲法和超声引导技术的肋间神经染色长度分别为 3.1±1.2cm 和 3.6±1.0cm(p=0.02)。在盲法(p=0.33)和超声引导技术(p=0.67)方面,两位医师之间没有差异。
与盲法相比,超声引导技术可提高肋间神经注射的准确性,与区域麻醉的专业水平无关。