Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):E2393-E2401. doi: 10.1002/lary.29387. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Language barriers may impact family experience, which is a key measure of healthcare quality. We compared family satisfaction between Spanish-speaking families (SSF) and English-speaking families (ESF) in pediatric otolaryngology.
Retrospective cohort study.
Responses from the Family Experience Survey (FES), a hospital quality benchmarking survey, were analyzed from 2017 to 2019 at one academic pediatric otolaryngology practice. Question responses were compared between SSF versus ESF using mixed effect logistic regression models, adjusting for patient age, medical complexity, and insurance.
A total of 4,964 FES survey responses were included (14% SSF). In multivariate analysis adjusting for age, medical complexity, and insurance, SSF were 1.7 times more likely than ESF to rate their provider with the highest rating (i.e. 9-10/10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.22). However, SSF were less likely than ESF to provide the highest rating on many individual aspects of care, including whether providers explained things intelligibly (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.74), listened carefully (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.28-0.47), knew their medical child's history (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.64), provided understandable information (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.83), spent sufficient time with them (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31-0.48), allowed them to discuss their questions (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.47-0.70), or had enough input in their children's' care (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.80).
In a large cohort of pediatric otolaryngology patients, SSF rated many individual aspects of their child's care less positively compared to ESF, despite rating their provider highly. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for these differences and how they can be improved.
4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2393-E2401, 2021.
目的/假设:语言障碍可能会影响家庭体验,而家庭体验是医疗质量的关键衡量标准。我们比较了小儿耳鼻喉科中讲西班牙语的家庭(SSF)和讲英语的家庭(ESF)的家庭满意度。
回顾性队列研究。
对一家学术性小儿耳鼻喉科诊所 2017 年至 2019 年期间的家庭体验调查(FES)的调查结果进行了分析。使用混合效应逻辑回归模型比较 SSF 与 ESF 之间的问题回答,同时调整了患者年龄、医疗复杂性和保险。
共纳入 4964 份 FES 调查回复(14% SSF)。在调整年龄、医疗复杂性和保险因素的多变量分析中,SSF 比 ESF 更有可能对其提供者给予最高评分(即 9-10/10;95%置信区间[CI]1.24-2.22)。然而,SSF 在许多护理方面的单项评分都低于 ESF,包括提供者是否清楚地解释了问题(优势比[OR]0.43,95%CI0.25-0.74)、是否仔细倾听(OR0.36,95%CI0.28-0.47)、是否了解他们孩子的病史(OR0.53,95%CI0.44-0.64)、提供易于理解的信息(OR0.36,95%CI0.16-0.83)、是否有足够的时间与他们相处(OR0.38,95%CI0.31-0.48)、是否允许他们讨论问题(OR0.57,95%CI0.47-0.70)或在孩子的护理中有足够的投入(OR0.46,95%CI0.26-0.80)。
在小儿耳鼻喉科的一大组患者中,SSF 对孩子护理的许多单项评分都低于 ESF,尽管他们对提供者的评价很高。需要进一步研究以探讨这些差异的原因以及如何改善这些差异。
4 级喉镜,131:E2393-E2401,2021 年。