• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抑酸剂预防心脏监护病房患者胃肠道出血的疗效和安全性。

The efficacy and safety of acid suppressants for gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in cardiac care unit patients.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Medical Informatics Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;36(8):2131-2140. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15432. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.15432
PMID:33586808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8451749/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Concerns regarding adverse events associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) prophylaxis in the intensive care unit have increased in recent years. Few studies have focused on acid suppressant use in the cardiac care unit (CCU) setting exclusively. We performed a cohort study to determine the efficacy and safety of acid suppressants for GIB prophylaxis in CCU patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adults who were admitted directly to the CCU for more than 2 days from January 1, 2014, to April 30, 2019. The Crusade score was calculated to evaluate the risk of GIB. The primary outcomes were clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (CIGIB), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 3318 patients enrolled, 2284 (68.8%) patients received PPIs, 515 (15.5%) received H2RAs, and 519 (15.7%) received no acid suppressants. After adjusting for potential confounders, utilization of PPIs (2.69, 95% confidence interval [0.62-11.73]) and H2RAs (1.41, 95% confidence interval [0.19-10.36]) were not associated with a lower risk of CIGIB than the control. Sensitivity analyses revealed that PPI use was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients over 75 years old, with an adjusted odds ratio of 4.08 (1.14-14.63). PPIs increased the risk of HAP in patients over 75 years old and in those with heart failure, with adjusted odds ratios of 2.38 (1.06-5.34) and 2.88 (1.34-7.28), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitors and H2RAs for GIB prophylaxis in CCU patients were not associated with a lower risk of CIGIB than the controls. PPI therapy is associated with increased risks of HAP and in-hospital mortality in patients over 75 years old. PPIs may increase the risk of HAP in patients with heart failure.

摘要

背景与目的

近年来,质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和组胺 2 受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)用于预防重症监护病房(ICU)胃肠道出血(GIB)的不良事件引起了人们的关注。很少有研究专门关注心脏监护病房(CCU)环境中酸抑制剂的使用。我们进行了一项队列研究,以确定 CCU 患者中 GIB 预防用酸抑制剂的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 30 日期间直接入住 CCU 超过 2 天的成年人。计算 Crusade 评分以评估 GIB 的风险。主要结局为临床显著胃肠道出血(CIGIB)、医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和院内死亡率。

结果

在纳入的 3318 例患者中,2284 例(68.8%)患者接受了 PPIs,515 例(15.5%)接受了 H2RAs,519 例(15.7%)未接受酸抑制剂。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,与对照组相比,PPIs(2.69,95%置信区间 [0.62-11.73])和 H2RAs(1.41,95%置信区间 [0.19-10.36])的使用与 CIGIB 风险降低无关。敏感性分析显示,对于 75 岁以上的患者,PPI 的使用是院内死亡率的独立危险因素,调整后的优势比为 4.08(1.14-14.63)。PPIs 增加了 75 岁以上患者和心力衰竭患者 HAP 的风险,调整后的优势比分别为 2.38(1.06-5.34)和 2.88(1.34-7.28)。

结论

CCU 患者中 GIB 预防用 PPIs 和 H2RAs 与对照组相比,并未降低 CIGIB 的风险。PPI 治疗与 75 岁以上患者 HAP 和院内死亡率的增加有关。PPIs 可能会增加心力衰竭患者发生 HAP 的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb6/8451749/0b732618d18a/JGH-36-2131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb6/8451749/0b732618d18a/JGH-36-2131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bb6/8451749/0b732618d18a/JGH-36-2131-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of acid suppressants for gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in cardiac care unit patients.抑酸剂预防心脏监护病房患者胃肠道出血的疗效和安全性。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;36(8):2131-2140. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15432. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.危重症患者胃肠道出血预防的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):1987-2000. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06209-w. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine Type 2 Receptor Blockers for Preventing Clinically Important Gastrointestinal Bleeding During Intensive Care: A Population-Based Study.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 型受体拮抗剂预防重症监护期间临床重要胃肠道出血的比较效果:一项基于人群的研究。
Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):557-566. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: systematic review and network meta-analysis.危重症患者胃肠出血预防的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 6;368:l6744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6744.
5
Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.组胺 2 受体拮抗剂与质子泵抑制剂对重症监护病房胃肠道出血和感染并发症的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):564-74. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14673.
6
A pragmatic assessment of proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine type 2 receptor antagonists on clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding and mortality when used for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the ICU.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 型受体拮抗剂在 ICU 应激性溃疡预防中用于临床重要胃肠道出血和死亡率的实用评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Oct;41(10):820-827. doi: 10.1002/phar.2621. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
7
Antacid Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure: Proton Pump Inhibitors vs. H Receptor Blockers.抗酸剂治疗冠心病和心力衰竭:质子泵抑制剂与 H2 受体阻滞剂。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Feb;38(1):181-189. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07358-4. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists Likely Increase Mortality in Critical Care: An Updated Meta-Analysis.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂可能增加重症监护患者的死亡率:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2021 Mar;134(3):e184-e188. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Comparative risk of Clostridium difficile infection between proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists: A 15-year hospital cohort study using a common data model.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂治疗期间艰难梭菌感染风险的比较:使用通用数据模型的 15 年医院队列研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;35(8):1325-1330. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14983. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Are Proton Pump Inhibitors More Effective Than Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.质子泵抑制剂是否比组胺 2 受体拮抗剂更能有效预防危重症患者应激性溃疡?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Sep;56(9):988-997. doi: 10.1177/10600280211059040. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of short-term proton pump inhibitors vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonists on gut microbiota in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A multicenter randomized trial.短期质子泵抑制剂与组胺-2受体拮抗剂对急性冠状动脉综合征患者肠道微生物群的影响:一项多中心随机试验
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Sep 23;138(5):542-52. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003148.
2
The benefit of omeprazole exposure on all-cause mortality and length of ICU/hospital stay might vary with age in critically ill pediatric patients: A cohort study.在危重症儿科患者中,奥美拉唑暴露对全因死亡率和重症监护病房/住院时间的影响可能因年龄而异:一项队列研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jan;80(1):115-125. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03588-z. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.质子泵抑制剂与组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防应激性溃疡对接受有创机械通气的 ICU 患者院内死亡率的影响:PEPTIC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 18;323(7):616-626. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190.
2
Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: systematic review and network meta-analysis.危重症患者胃肠出血预防的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 6;368:l6744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6744.
3
Proton pump inhibitors, adverse events and increased risk of mortality.
质子泵抑制剂、不良事件与死亡率升高。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;18(11):1043-1053. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1664470. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
4
Pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding-1-year mortality in the SUP-ICU trial.重症监护病房(ICU)中存在胃肠道出血风险的患者使用泮托拉唑- SUP-ICU 试验 1 年死亡率。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1184-1190. doi: 10.1111/aas.13436. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
5
Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors Based on a Large, Multi-Year, Randomized Trial of Patients Receiving Rivaroxaban or Aspirin.基于接受利伐沙班或阿司匹林的患者的大型多年随机试验的质子泵抑制剂安全性。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Sep;157(3):682-691.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Estimates of all cause mortality and cause specific mortality associated with proton pump inhibitors among US veterans: cohort study.质子泵抑制剂与美国退伍军人全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率的相关性:队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1580.
7
Pantoprazole prophylaxis in ICU patients with high severity of disease: a post hoc analysis of the placebo-controlled SUP-ICU trial.重症监护病房高疾病严重程度患者的泮托拉唑预防:安慰剂对照 SUP-ICU 试验的事后分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 May;45(5):609-618. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05589-y. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Reduced risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy after myocardial infarction.与心肌梗死后接受双联抗血小板治疗的患者相比,质子泵抑制剂治疗降低了胃肠道出血的风险。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1963-1970. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz104.
9
Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.质子泵抑制剂或组胺 2 受体拮抗剂预防成人重症监护患者应激性溃疡:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Feb;45(2):143-158. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05526-z. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU.重症监护病房有胃肠道出血风险的患者使用泮托拉唑。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 6;379(23):2199-2208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714919. Epub 2018 Oct 24.