• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者中阿司匹林与双联抗血小板治疗的比较:更新的荟萃分析。

Aspirin Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation, Updated Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Services, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Apr;36(2):279-283. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07146-6. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10557-021-07146-6
PMID:33587229
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation (POPular TAVI) trial reported comparable composite endpoints of ischemic events using aspirin compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, this trial was not powered to detect individual differences in ischemic events. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis to compare aspirin to DAPT on ischemic and bleeding events following TAVI.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched from inception until September 2020 and only randomized clinical trials of patients receiving antiplatelet therapy following TAVI were included. The treatment effect was reported as rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials of 1086 TAVI patients were included. There was a 51% reduction in major or life-threatening bleeding with aspirin compared with DAPT [RR 0.49, (95%CI 0.31 to 0.78)]. Aspirin was not associated with an increased risk of death [RR 1.01, (95%CI 0.62 to 1.65)], cardiovascular death [RR 1.15, (95%CI 0.56 to 2.36)], ischemic stroke [RR 0.93, (95%CI 0.51 to 1.70)], or MI [RR 0.53, (95%CI 0.18 to 1.57)].

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the use of aspirin as the optimal antiplatelet strategy following TAVI procedures in reducing bleeding without an increase in ischemic events compared with dual antiplatelet therapy.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(POPular TAVI)试验报告称,与双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)相比,使用阿司匹林可获得可比的缺血性事件复合终点。然而,该试验没有足够的能力检测缺血性事件的个体差异。我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以比较 TAVI 后阿司匹林与 DAPT 对缺血和出血事件的影响。

方法

从 MEDLINE 数据库建立到 2020 年 9 月进行检索,仅纳入接受 TAVI 后接受抗血小板治疗的患者的随机临床试验。治疗效果以率比(RR)及其 95%置信区间报告。

结果

纳入了四项 TAVI 患者的随机临床试验,共 1086 例患者。与 DAPT 相比,阿司匹林可使主要或危及生命的出血减少 51%[RR 0.49,(95%CI 0.31 至 0.78)]。阿司匹林与死亡[RR 1.01,(95%CI 0.62 至 1.65)]、心血管死亡[RR 1.15,(95%CI 0.56 至 2.36)]、缺血性卒[RR 0.93,(95%CI 0.51 至 1.70)]或 MI[RR 0.53,(95%CI 0.18 至 1.57)]的风险增加无关。

结论

与双联抗血小板治疗相比,本荟萃分析支持在 TAVI 术后使用阿司匹林作为最佳抗血小板策略,以减少出血而不增加缺血性事件。

相似文献

1
Aspirin Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation, Updated Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者中阿司匹林与双联抗血小板治疗的比较:更新的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Apr;36(2):279-283. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07146-6. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Aspirin Versus Aspirin Plus Clopidogrel as Antithrombotic Treatment Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve: The ARTE (Aspirin Versus Aspirin + Clopidogrel Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后抗栓治疗:阿司匹林与阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷的疗效对比(ARTE 研究):一项随机临床试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1357-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
Aspirin Alone Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后单用阿司匹林与双联抗血小板治疗对比:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2022 Apr;36(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07145-7. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
4
Antithrombotic strategies after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的抗血栓策略:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;362:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.060. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后双联抗血小板治疗与单药抗血小板治疗的比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jan;34:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
Dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的双联抗血小板治疗与单联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 Feb;24(2):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
Pre-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy and bleeding events following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)前双联抗血小板治疗与出血事件。
Thromb Res. 2015 Jul;136(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14.
8
Meta-Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Single vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后双联抗血小板治疗与单联抗血小板治疗安全性和有效性的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;145:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.087. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Antithrombotic therapy in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a network meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后患者的抗血栓治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Aug 14;10(5):454-464. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad101.
10
Effects of single versus dual antiplatelet therapy on the adverse events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后双联与单联抗血小板治疗对不良事件的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Dec;44(12):1718-1728. doi: 10.1002/clc.23731. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comprehensive review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的最佳抗栓治疗:一项全面综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 10;12:1528071. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1528071. eCollection 2025.
2
Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Overview.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的抗栓治疗:概述
Struct Heart. 2022 Sep 15;6(5):100085. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100085. eCollection 2022 Oct.