Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Division Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Jacob's School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York.
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Dec 1;32(8):681-688. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001026.
The relative safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have not been well defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to assess in-hospital outcomes in this population.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2020 for all clinical trials and observational studies. Five observational studies with a total of 6769 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 in CKD group and ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m2 in non-CKD group). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, coronary injury (perforation, dissection or tamponade), stroke and procedural success. Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with CKD undergoing PCI for CTO (OR: 5.16, 95% CI: 2.60-10.26, P < 0.00001). Acute kidney injury (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.89-3.40, P < 0.00001) and major bleeding (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.20-5.54, P < 0.01) were also more common in the CKD group. No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of stroke (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 0.74-7.54, P < 0.15) or coronary injury (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 0.98-1.93, P < 0.06) between the two groups. Non-CKD patients had a higher likelihood of procedural success compared to CKD patients (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57-0.77, P < 0.00001).
Patients with CKD undergoing PCI for CTO have a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury and major bleeding when compared to non-CKD patients. They also have a lower procedural success rate.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者慢性完全闭塞(CTO)的相对安全性和疗效尚未明确。我们对观察性研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估该人群的住院结局。
我们从 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中检索了从成立到 2020 年 4 月的所有临床试验和观察性研究。共有 5 项观察性研究,总计 6769 例患者符合纳入标准。根据估计肾小球滤过率(CKD 组 eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2,非 CKD 组 eGFR≥60ml/min/1.73m2)将患者分为两组。主要结局为住院死亡率。次要结局为急性肾损伤、冠状动脉损伤(穿孔、夹层或填塞)、卒中和手术成功率。采用 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应模型计算比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
CKD 患者行 CTO-PCI 后住院死亡率显著升高(OR:5.16,95%CI:2.60-10.26,P<0.00001)。CKD 组急性肾损伤(OR:2.54,95%CI:1.89-3.40,P<0.00001)和主要出血(OR:2.58,95%CI:1.20-5.54,P<0.01)也更为常见。两组间卒中(OR:2.36,95%CI:0.74-7.54,P<0.15)或冠状动脉损伤(OR:1.38,95%CI:0.98-1.93,P<0.06)的发生率无显著差异。与 CKD 患者相比,非 CKD 患者手术成功率更高(OR:0.66,95%CI:0.57-0.77,P<0.00001)。
与非 CKD 患者相比,CKD 患者行 CTO-PCI 的住院死亡率、急性肾损伤和主要出血风险显著升高,手术成功率也较低。