Department of Dermatology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Dermatologic Surgicenter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Mar 1;47(3):e81-e85. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002816.
There is no standardized approach for nonsurgical techniques for penile augmentation despite the increase of demand for this intervention.
To compare the efficacy and safety between different injection techniques.
On October 8, 2019, a literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database. All articles describing penile augmentation were included.
Thirteen studies were included in this article with a total of 1,311 patients. Five studies were prospective cohort. The most commonly described technique was hyaluronic acid fillers with a total of 4 articles and 205 patients. The mean injected volume ranged from 20 to 40 mL. In all included studies, a minority of patients had side effects, but some had disabling complications.
There are no defined clinical guidelines for penile augmentation techniques implemented yet. Hyaluronic acid seems to be safe, efficient, and with a high satisfaction score. Further randomized control trials are warranted.
2a.
尽管对这种干预的需求增加，但非手术阴茎增大技术尚无标准化方法。
比较不同注射技术的疗效和安全性。
2019 年 10 月 8 日，在 PubMed、Embase、Ovid 和 Cochrane 数据库上进行了文献检索。纳入所有描述阴茎增大的文章。
本文共纳入 13 项研究，共 1311 例患者。5 项研究为前瞻性队列研究。最常描述的技术是透明质酸填充物，共有 4 篇文章和 205 例患者。平均注射量为 20 至 40 毫升。在所有纳入的研究中，少数患者有副作用，但有些患者有致残性并发症。
目前尚无明确的阴茎增大技术临床指南。透明质酸似乎是安全、有效且满意度高的。需要进一步的随机对照试验。
2a。
