Effect of Metatarsus Adductus on Hallux Valgus Treated With Proximal Reverse Chevron Metatarsal Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes and recurrence rates after reverse proximal chevron metatarsal osteotomy (PCMO) for patients with hallux valgus (HV) with or without metatarsus adductus (MA). We hypothesized that patients with MA would have poorer outcomes and a higher radiographic recurrence rate than those without MA.

METHODS

This retrospective single-surgeon series comprised 144 patients (173 feet) with moderate to severe HV, treated with PCMO and Akin osteotomy without lesser metatarsal procedures, who were grouped according to the presence (MA group) or absence of MA (non-MA group). Clinical assessment included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, pain visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction rating. Radiographic assessments included metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), HV angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA).

RESULTS

The prevalence of the MA was 24.2%. The mean MAA was 23.1 ± 3.3 degrees in the MA group. There were no differences in the mean AOFAS score and pain VAS score at the final follow-up between the 2 groups (all > .05). The patient satisfaction rate was 73.8% in the MA group vs 90.1% in the non-MA group ( = .017). The mean postoperative HVA and IMA significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups, respectively (all < .001). Preoperative and postoperative HVA were larger in the MA group vs non-MA group. However, no significant difference was found in the improvement of HVA and IMA after surgery between the 2 groups (all > .05). The recurrence rate was 28.6% in the MA group and 6.1% in the non-MA group ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

HV patients associated with the MA had a higher degree of preoperative HV, lower correction of the HVA, higher radiographic recurrence rate, and poorer patient satisfaction than those without MA post-PCMO without lesser metatarsal procedures. Therefore, a more extensive HV correction procedure or the addition of a lesser metatarsal realignment procedure may need to be considered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.