Living donor liver transplantation for pediatric patients with metabolic disease vs. deceased donation.

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting reports on the outcomes of patients with metabolic liver disease after liver transplantation. We aimed to compare the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for metabolic disease vs orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) from deceased donation.

METHODS

Clinical data of 89 patients undergoing liver transplantation for the treatment of metabolic disorders were reviewed. Pre- and peri-transplant demographics, survival rate, complications and laboratory test data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

For the 89 patients, only 2 died by the end of the last follow-up. The post-transplant EAD rate and severe complications were higher for OLT than LDLT. No significant difference was found between LDLT and OLT for the incidence of EBV and CMV infections. In terms of laboratory indexes, the recovery time of PLT, AKP and AST levels were significantly longer for OLT than LDLT. Among different types of metabolic disease, no significant difference was found in viral infection, EAD, laboratory indexes, severe complications or duration of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT shows a lower incidence rate of EAD and complications, while it also shows a 1-year survival rate and incidence of viral infections compared similar to that of OLT. LDLT is the better treatment option of pediatric liver transplantation for metabolic liver disease compared with OLT.