Suppr超能文献

在两阶段交叉临床试验中使用最大检验统计量。

Using the maximum test statistic in the two-period crossover clinical trial.

作者信息

Willan A R

机构信息

National Cancer Institute of Canada, Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario.

出版信息

Biometrics. 1988 Mar;44(1):211-8.

PMID:3358989
Abstract

In a two-period crossover trial where residual carryover is suspected, it is often advised that first-period data only be used in an analysis appropriate for a parallel design. However, it has been shown (Willan and Pater, 1986, Biometrics 42, 593-599) that the crossover analysis is more powerful than the parallel analysis if the residual carryover, expressed as a proportion of treatment effect, is less than 2- square root of 2(1 - rho), where rho is the intrasubject correlation coefficient. Choosing between the analyses based on the empirical evaluation of this condition is equivalent to choosing the analysis with the larger corresponding test statistic. Approximate nominal significance levels are presented that maintain the desired level when basing the analysis on the maximum test statistic. Furthermore, the power and precision of the analysis based on the maximum test statistic are compared to the crossover and parallel analyses.

摘要

在怀疑存在残留效应的两阶段交叉试验中,通常建议仅将第一阶段的数据用于适合平行设计的分析。然而,研究表明(威兰和佩特,1986年,《生物统计学》42卷,593 - 599页),如果以治疗效果的比例表示的残留效应小于2 - √2(1 - ρ),其中ρ是个体内相关系数,那么交叉分析比平行分析更具效力。基于对该条件的实证评估在两种分析方法之间进行选择,等同于选择具有更大相应检验统计量的分析方法。给出了近似的名义显著性水平,当基于最大检验统计量进行分析时可维持所需水平。此外,还将基于最大检验统计量的分析的效力和精度与交叉分析和平行分析进行了比较。

相似文献

5
The crossover experiment for clinical trials.
Biometrics. 1980 Mar;36(1):69-79.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验