Zablah Jenny E, Rodriguez Salvador A, Leahy Ryan, Morgan Gareth J
The Heart Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13123 East 16th Avenue, Box 100, Aurora, CO, USA.
School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Apr;42(4):926-933. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02564-7. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of multimodality imaging technology during percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). Among percutaneous procedures, PPVI traditionally has one of the highest patient radiation exposures. Different protocol modifications have been implemented to address this problem (i.e., improvements in guidance systems, delivery systems, valve design, post-implantation evaluation). Although the effectiveness of individual modifications has been proven, the effect of an approach which combines these changes has not been reported. We performed a retrospective chart review of 76 patients who underwent PPVI between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients were classified in "Traditional protocol," using routine biplane angiography and/or 3D rotational angiography (3DRA); and "Multimodality protocol" that included the use of VesselNavigator for guidance, selective 3DRA for coronary evaluation, Long DrySeal Sheath for valve delivery, and Intracardiac Echocardiography for valve evaluation after implantation. Radiation metrics, procedural time, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. When the traditional protocol group was compared with the multimodality protocol group, a significant reduction was described for total fluoroscopy time (31.6 min vs. 26.2 min), dose of contrast per kilogram (1.8 mL/Kg vs. 0.9 mL/Kg), DAP/kg (26.6 µGy·m/kg vs. 19.9 µGy·m/kg), and Air Kerma (194 mGy vs. 99.9 mGy). A reduction for procedure time was noted (140 min vs. 116.5 min), but this was not statistically significant. There was no difference in clinical outcomes or the presence of complications between groups. The combination of novel technology in PPVI caused a significant reduction in radiation metrics without increasing the complication rate in our population.
本研究的目的是评估多模态成像技术在经皮肺动脉瓣植入术(PPVI)中的影响。在经皮手术中,PPVI传统上是患者辐射暴露最高的手术之一。已经实施了不同的方案改进来解决这个问题(即,引导系统、输送系统、瓣膜设计、植入后评估方面的改进)。虽然个别改进的有效性已得到证实,但将这些改变结合起来的方法的效果尚未见报道。我们对2018年1月至2019年12月期间接受PPVI的76例患者进行了回顾性病历审查。患者被分为“传统方案”组,采用常规双平面血管造影和/或三维旋转血管造影(3DRA);以及“多模态方案”组,该组包括使用血管导航仪进行引导、选择性3DRA进行冠状动脉评估、长干密封鞘进行瓣膜输送以及心内超声心动图进行植入后瓣膜评估。比较了两组之间的辐射指标、手术时间和临床结果。当将传统方案组与多模态方案组进行比较时,发现总透视时间显著减少(31.6分钟对26.2分钟)、每千克造影剂剂量(1.8 mL/Kg对0.9 mL/Kg)、剂量面积乘积/千克(26.6 µGy·m/kg对19.9 µGy·m/kg)和气比释动能(194 mGy对99.9 mGy)。注意到手术时间有所减少(140分钟对116.5分钟),但这在统计学上不显著。两组之间的临床结果或并发症发生率没有差异。PPVI中新技术的结合在不增加我们研究人群并发症发生率的情况下,使辐射指标显著降低。