Women's and Children's CBU, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, Kings Cross, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
J Robot Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):81-88. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01197-5. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
This was a retrospective study to review the uptake and outcomes of robotic gynaecological surgery in England between 1st April 2006 and 31st March 2018, analysing Hospital Episode Statistics form National Health Service hospitals in England. Women aged 18 years and above who had elective gynaecological surgery were included and those who had undergone robotic gynaecology surgery were included. Robotic gynaecological procedures were defined as procedures that used a robotic minimal access approach for hysterectomy, adnexal surgery and urogynaecological surgery (sacrocolpopexy, sacrohysteropexy and colposuspension). Numbers of procedures were reviewed by year and mapped to the 44 NHS healthcare regions. Length of stay (nights in hospital), laparotomy (conversion during primary procedure or after return to theatre for management of complication), and 30-day emergency readmission rates were calculated by year and procedure type. Overall 527,217 elective gynaecological procedures were performed in the English NHS (1st April 2006 and 31st March 2018), of which 4384 (0.83%) were performed with robotic assistance (3864 (88%) hysterectomy, 706 (16%) adnexal surgery, 192 (4%) urogynaecological surgery). There was gradual rise in the uptake of robotic surgery but there was a marked geographical variation. Median (IQR) length of stay (LOS) was 1(1-2) night, laparotomy rate was 0.3% and 30-day emergency readmission rate was 4.7%. LOS was statistically, but not clinically, different across time. Other outcomes did not differ by year. Robotic gynaecological procedures are increasingly being used in the English NHS, predominantly for hysterectomy, although in small proportions (2.6% in the most recent study year). There was wide geographical variation in robotic uptake across England and overall, outcomes were comparable to those reported in other countries.
这是一项回顾性研究,旨在分析英格兰国家卫生服务体系医院的医院入院和出院统计数据,调查 2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日期间机器人妇科手术在英格兰的应用情况和结果。研究纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、接受择期妇科手术的女性,包括接受机器人妇科手术的患者。机器人妇科手术的定义为采用机器人微创方法进行子宫切除术、附件手术和泌尿妇科手术(骶骨阴道固定术、骶骨子宫固定术和阴道吊带术)。研究对每年的手术数量进行了回顾,并将其映射到 44 个英国国民保健服务医疗区域。通过年和手术类型计算了住院时间(住院夜数)、剖腹术(初次手术中转为剖腹术或术后返回手术室处理并发症)和 30 天内急诊再入院率。在英格兰国民保健服务体系中,2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日期间共进行了 527217 例择期妇科手术,其中 4384 例(0.83%)采用机器人辅助(3864 例[88%]子宫切除术、706 例[16%]附件手术、192 例[4%]泌尿妇科手术)。机器人手术的应用逐渐增加,但存在明显的地域差异。中位(IQR)住院时间(LOS)为 1(1-2)晚,剖腹术率为 0.3%,30 天内急诊再入院率为 4.7%。尽管时间上存在统计学差异,但 LOS 并无临床差异。其他结果在不同年份之间没有差异。机器人妇科手术在英格兰国民保健服务体系中的应用越来越多,主要用于子宫切除术,尽管比例较小(在最近的研究年份为 2.6%)。英格兰各地的机器人应用存在广泛差异,总体而言,手术结果与其他国家报道的结果相当。