• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的骨质疏松症和脆性骨折诊断信息的质量和内容。

Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Diagnoses.

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC (Dr. Wally, Dr. Bemenderfer, Dr. McKnight, Dr. Gorbaty, Dr. Seymour, and Dr. Karunakar); the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Prisma Health-Upstate; Greenville, SC (Dr. Jeray); and the University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, Greenville, SC (Dr. Jeray).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Feb 12;5(2):e00192. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00192.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00192
PMID:33591128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7886427/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to assess the quality and content of websites addressing orthopaedic conditions affecting older adults, emphasizing osteoporosis and fragility fracture.

METHODS

Ten diagnoses were chosen. The transparency of information was assessed via the Health On the Net (HON) score; information content was assessed via diagnosis-specific grading templates. A total of 140 websites (14 per diagnosis) were reviewed by three raters. HON scores and information quality were compared by diagnosis, website type, and website source. The correlation between HON score and information quality score was calculated.

RESULTS

Most websites were commercial (59.3%). Cronbach alpha for Hall scores exceeded the a priori threshold of 0.7. Analysis proceeded using averages across raters. HON score was significantly associated with higher content scores (r = 0.56; P < 0.0001). Content scores ranged from 21.1 to 59.4. Content scores differed significantly by diagnosis (P = 0.0008) and website source (P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

The quality and content of websites is highly variable for osteoporosis and fragility fracture diagnoses. Patients should be encouraged to access reputable sites, including sites displaying a HON seal. Academic and medical specialty societies demonstrate opportunity for improvement of their own websites and might be able to lead efforts to increase accessibility of high-quality content.

摘要

简介

我们旨在评估针对影响老年人的骨科疾病的网站的质量和内容,重点关注骨质疏松症和脆性骨折。

方法

选择了十种诊断。通过健康在线(HON)评分评估信息的透明度;通过特定于诊断的分级模板评估信息内容。由三名评估员审查了总共 140 个网站(每个诊断 14 个)。根据诊断、网站类型和网站来源比较 HON 评分和信息质量。计算 HON 评分与信息质量评分之间的相关性。

结果

大多数网站都是商业性的(59.3%)。霍尔评分的 Cronbach alpha 超过了事先设定的 0.7 阈值。使用评估者的平均值进行分析。HON 评分与更高的内容评分显著相关(r = 0.56;P < 0.0001)。内容评分范围从 21.1 到 59.4。内容评分因诊断(P = 0.0008)和网站来源(P < 0.0001)而异。

讨论

骨质疏松症和脆性骨折诊断的网站质量和内容差异很大。应鼓励患者访问信誉良好的网站,包括显示 HON 印章的网站。学术和医学专业协会有机会改进其自己的网站,并且可能能够领导增加高质量内容的可访问性的工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/df6907200bf4/jagrr-5-e00192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/738237868fe4/jagrr-5-e00192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/c242581409b6/jagrr-5-e00192-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/df6907200bf4/jagrr-5-e00192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/738237868fe4/jagrr-5-e00192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/c242581409b6/jagrr-5-e00192-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea13/7886427/df6907200bf4/jagrr-5-e00192-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Diagnoses.基于互联网的骨质疏松症和脆性骨折诊断信息的质量和内容。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Feb 12;5(2):e00192. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00192.
2
Quality and content of Internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses.基于互联网的十种常见骨科运动医学诊断的信息质量和内容。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jul 7;92(7):1612-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00821.
3
Internet information quality for ten common foot and ankle diagnoses.十种常见足踝疾病的互联网信息质量。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Sep;18(3):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
4
Surfing Behind a Boat: Quality and Reliability of Online Resources on Scaphoid Fractures.船后冲浪:舟骨骨折在线资源的质量与可靠性
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016 Oct;21(3):374-81. doi: 10.1142/S2424835516500375.
5
Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.翻修全髋关节置换术:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析。
World J Orthop. 2020 Feb 18;11(2):82-89. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i2.82.
6
The quality of pediatric orthopaedic information on the internet.互联网上儿科骨科信息的质量。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Jun;34(4):474-7. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000125.
7
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.耳鸣的英文互联网信息的质量与可读性
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):31-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17070. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
10
Surfing for hip replacements: has the "internet tidal wave" led to better quality information.冲浪寻找髋关节置换:“互联网浪潮”是否带来了更好质量的信息。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1339-1344.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Content Analysis of Arabic Websites As Patient Resources for Osteoporosis.作为骨质疏松症患者资源的阿拉伯语网站内容分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 19;16(7):e64880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64880. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Online Patient Education Resources for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Information on the Internet Over the Past Decade.前交叉韧带重建的在线患者教育资源:过去十年互联网上信息的准确性和可靠性评估
Cureus. 2023 Oct 6;15(10):e46599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46599. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Internet search analysis on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: What do people ask and read online?

本文引用的文献

1
Revision total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of the quality and readability of information on the internet.翻修全髋关节置换术:互联网上信息的质量与可读性分析。
World J Orthop. 2020 Feb 18;11(2):82-89. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i2.82.
2
The Quality and Accuracy of Online Resources for Total and Reverse Shoulder Replacement.全肩关节置换和反肩关节置换在线资源的质量与准确性
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2019 Winter;28(4):290-294.
3
Does Google™ Have the Answers? The Internet-based Information on Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures.谷歌™能给出答案吗?基于互联网的骨盆与髋臼骨折信息
类风湿关节炎治疗的互联网搜索分析:人们在网上问了什么、看了什么?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 22;18(9):e0285869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285869. eCollection 2023.
4
How high is the quality of the videos about children's elbow fractures on Youtube?Youtube 上有关儿童肘部骨折的视频质量有多高?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 3;18(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03648-1.
Cureus. 2019 Oct 21;11(10):e5952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5952.
4
Evaluation of information available on the internet regarding reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.互联网上关于反式全肩关节置换术的可用信息评估。
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Jul;11(2 Suppl):29-34. doi: 10.1177/1758573217713720. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
What information can the lay public find about osteoporosis treatment? A descriptive study coding the content and quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet.公众可以在哪里找到关于骨质疏松症治疗的信息?一项描述性研究对互联网上双膦酸盐信息的内容和质量进行编码。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Nov;30(11):2299-2310. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05008-4. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
Patients' Use and Perception of Internet-Based Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Resources.患者对基于互联网的骨科运动医学资源的使用与认知
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Sep 20;6(9):2325967118796469. doi: 10.1177/2325967118796469. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Health Information Obtained From the Internet and Changes in Medical Decision Making: Questionnaire Development and Cross-Sectional Survey.从互联网获取的健康信息与医疗决策的变化:问卷开发与横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 12;20(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9370.
8
Patient Preferences and Utilization of Online Resources for Patients Treated in Hand Surgery Practices.手部外科手术患者对手部手术在线资源的偏好与利用情况
Hand (N Y). 2019 Mar;14(2):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1558944717744340. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
Epidemiology of fragility fractures and fall prevention in the elderly: a systematic review of the literature.老年人脆性骨折的流行病学与跌倒预防:文献系统综述
Curr Orthop Pract. 2017 Nov;28(6):580-585. doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000563. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
10
Surfing Behind a Boat: Quality and Reliability of Online Resources on Scaphoid Fractures.船后冲浪:舟骨骨折在线资源的质量与可靠性
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2016 Oct;21(3):374-81. doi: 10.1142/S2424835516500375.