Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037341. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37341.
Several meta-analyses have summarized evidence for the association between dietary factors and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, to date, there has been little synthesis of the strength, precision, and quality of this evidence in aggregate.
To grade the evidence from published meta-analyses of prospective observational studies that assessed the association of dietary patterns, specific foods, food groups, beverages (including alcohol), macronutrients, and micronutrients with the incidence of CRC.
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to September 2019.
Only meta-analyses of prospective observational studies with a cohort study design were eligible. Evidence of association was graded according to established criteria as follows: convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant.
From 9954 publications, 222 full-text articles (2.2%) were evaluated for eligibility, and 45 meta-analyses (20.3%) that described 109 associations between dietary factors and CRC incidence were selected. Overall, 35 of the 109 associations (32.1%) were nominally statistically significant using random-effects meta-analysis models; 17 associations (15.6%) demonstrated large heterogeneity between studies (I2 > 50%), whereas small-study effects were found for 11 associations (10.1%). Excess significance bias was not detected for any association between diet and CRC. The primary analysis identified 5 (4.6%) convincing, 2 (1.8%) highly suggestive, 10 (9.2%) suggestive, and 18 (16.5%) weak associations between diet and CRC, while there was no evidence for 74 (67.9%) associations. There was convincing evidence of an association of intake of red meat (high vs low) and alcohol (≥4 drinks/d vs 0 or occasional drinks) with the incidence of CRC and an inverse association of higher vs lower intakes of dietary fiber, calcium, and yogurt with CRC risk. The evidence for convincing associations remained robust following sensitivity analyses.
This umbrella review found convincing evidence of an association between lower CRC risk and higher intakes of dietary fiber, dietary calcium, and yogurt and lower intakes of alcohol and red meat. More research is needed on specific foods for which evidence remains suggestive, including other dairy products, whole grains, processed meat, and specific dietary patterns.
几项荟萃分析总结了饮食因素与结直肠癌(CRC)发病率之间的关联证据。然而,迄今为止,对于这些证据的强度、精度和质量的综合研究很少。
对评估饮食模式、特定食物、食物组、饮料(包括酒精)、宏量营养素和微量营养素与 CRC 发病率之间关联的前瞻性观察性研究的已发表荟萃分析的证据进行分级。
从数据库建立到 2019 年 9 月,检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆。
只有队列研究设计的前瞻性观察性研究的荟萃分析才有资格入选。根据既定标准,将关联证据评为以下等级:有说服力、高度提示、提示、微弱或无显著性。
从 9954 篇文献中,评估了 222 篇全文文章(2.2%)的入选资格,选择了 45 项描述饮食因素与 CRC 发病率之间 109 种关联的荟萃分析。总体而言,使用随机效应荟萃分析模型,109 种关联中有 35 种(32.1%)具有名义统计学意义;17 种关联(15.6%)存在研究间高度异质性(I2>50%),而 11 种关联(10.1%)存在小样本效应。没有发现任何饮食与 CRC 之间的关联存在过度显著性偏差。主要分析确定了 5 种(4.6%)有说服力、2 种(1.8%)高度提示、10 种(9.2%)提示和 18 种(16.5%)微弱的饮食与 CRC 之间的关联,而 74 种(67.9%)关联则没有证据支持。有说服力的证据表明,摄入红肉(高 vs 低)和酒精(≥4 份/d 与 0 或偶尔饮酒)与 CRC 的发生呈正相关,而较高与较低的膳食纤维、钙和酸奶摄入量与 CRC 风险呈负相关。在进行敏感性分析后,有说服力的关联证据仍然稳健。
本伞式综述发现有说服力的证据表明,较低的 CRC 风险与较高的膳食纤维、膳食钙和酸奶摄入以及较低的酒精和红肉摄入有关。需要对证据仍提示的特定食物进行更多研究,包括其他乳制品、全谷物、加工肉类和特定饮食模式。