Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Department of Surgery, Carolinas Center for Surgical Outcomes Science, Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Nov;406(7):2177-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02093-0. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Ex vivo hepatectomy is the incorporation of liver transplant techniques in the non-transplant setting, providing opportunity for locally advanced tumors found conventionally unresectable. Because the procedure is rare and reports in the literature are limited, we sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating technical variations of ex vivo hepatectomies.
In the literature, there is a split in those performing the procedure between venovenous bypass (VVB) and temporary portacaval shunts (PCS). Of the 253 articles identified on the topic of ex vivo resection, 37 had sufficient data to be included in our review.
The majority of these procedures were performed for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (69%) followed by primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. In 18 series, VVB was used, and in 18, a temporary PCS was performed. Comparing these two groups, intraoperative variables and morbidity were not statistically different, with a cumulative trend in favor of PCS. Ninety-day mortality was significantly lower in the PCS group compared to the VVB group (p=0.03).
In order to better elucidate these differences between technical approaches, a registry and consensus statement are needed.
在非移植环境下采用肝移植技术进行离体肝切除术,为常规不可切除的局部晚期肿瘤提供机会。由于该手术较为罕见,且文献报道有限,我们旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查离体肝切除术的技术差异。
在文献中,行该手术的医生分为行静脉-静脉转流术(venovenous bypass,VVB)和临时门腔分流术(temporary portacaval shunts,PCS)的医生。在关于离体肝切除的 253 篇文章中,有 37 篇具有足够的数据纳入我们的综述。
这些手术大多是为肝泡状棘球蚴病(hepatic alveolar echinococcosis,HACE)(69%)进行的,其次是原发性和继发性肝癌。在 18 个系列中使用了 VVB,在 18 个系列中使用了临时 PCS。比较这两组,术中变量和发病率没有统计学差异,PCS 组有累积趋势。与 VVB 组相比,PCS 组 90 天死亡率显著降低(p=0.03)。
为了更好地阐明这些技术方法之间的差异,需要一个登记处和共识声明。