Norman Gill, Shi Chunhu, Westby Maggie J, Price Bianca L, McBain Andrew J, Dumville Jo C, Cullum Nicky
Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Wound Repair Regen. 2021 May;29(3):466-477. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12898. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
The wound microbiome may play an important role in the wound healing process. We conducted the first systematic prognosis review investigating whether aspects of the wound microbiome are independent prognostic factors for the healing of complex wounds. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library to February 2019. We included longitudinal studies which assessed the independent association of aspects of wound microbiome with healing of complex wounds while controlling for confounding factors. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. We synthesised studies narratively due to the clinical and methodological heterogeneity of included studies and sparse data. We identified 28 cohorts from 21 studies with a total of 38,604 participants, including people with diabetes and foot ulcers, open surgical wounds, venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers. Risk of bias varied from low (2 cohorts) to high (17 cohorts); the great majority of participants were in cohorts at high risk of bias. Most evidence related to the association of baseline clinical wound infection with healing. Clinical infection at baseline may be associated with less likelihood of wound healing in foot ulcers in diabetes (HR from cohort with moderate risk of bias 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.83) or slower healing in open surgical wounds (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83); evidence in other wounds is more limited. Most other associations assessed showed no clear relationship with wound healing; evidence was limited and often sparse; and we documented gaps in the evidence. There is low certainty evidence that a diagnosis of wound infection may be prognostic of poorer healing in foot ulcers in diabetes, and some moderate certainty evidence for this in open surgical wounds. Low certainty evidence means that more research could change these findings.
伤口微生物群可能在伤口愈合过程中发挥重要作用。我们进行了首次系统性预后综述,调查伤口微生物群的各个方面是否为复杂伤口愈合的独立预后因素。我们检索了截至2019年2月的Medline、Embase、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆。我们纳入了纵向研究,这些研究在控制混杂因素的同时,评估了伤口微生物群各方面与复杂伤口愈合的独立关联。两名评审员提取数据,并使用GRADE方法评估偏倚风险和证据的确定性。由于纳入研究的临床和方法学异质性以及数据稀少,我们对研究进行了叙述性综合分析。我们从21项研究中确定了28个队列,共有38,604名参与者,包括患有糖尿病和足部溃疡、开放性手术伤口、下肢静脉溃疡和压疮的患者。偏倚风险从低(2个队列)到高(17个队列)不等;绝大多数参与者处于高偏倚风险队列中。大多数证据与基线临床伤口感染与愈合的关联有关。基线时的临床感染可能与糖尿病足部溃疡伤口愈合的可能性降低有关(来自中度偏倚风险队列的HR为0.53,95%CI为0.33至0.83),或与开放性手术伤口愈合较慢有关(HR为0.65,95%CI为0.51至0.83);其他伤口的证据更为有限。评估的大多数其他关联与伤口愈合无明确关系;证据有限且往往稀少;我们记录了证据中的空白。低确定性证据表明,伤口感染的诊断可能预示着糖尿病足部溃疡愈合较差,在开放性手术伤口中有一些中度确定性证据支持这一点。低确定性证据意味着更多的研究可能会改变这些结果。