Suppr超能文献

基于微血管阻力指数和左心室舒张末期压力的急性心肌梗死风险分层。

Risk Stratification Guided by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences (A.M.M., P.J.M., K.G.O., M.M., H.E., D.C., C.B.), University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.

West of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, Glasgow, United Kingdom (A.M.M., P.J.M., K.G.O., M.L., M.M., H.E., J.P.R., R.G., A.S., K.R., S.H., S.W., D.C., T.J.F., C.B.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009529. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009529. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) of the infarct-related artery and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) are acute, prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The clinical significance of IMR and LVEDP in combination is unknown.

METHODS

IMR and LVEDP were prospectively measured in a prespecified substudy of the T-TIME clinical trial (Trial of Low Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI). IMR was measured using a pressure- and temperature-sensing guidewire following percutaneous coronary intervention. Prognostically established thresholds for IMR (>32) and LVEDP (>18 mm Hg) were predefined. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (1.5 Tesla) was acquired 2 to 7 days and 3 months postmyocardial infarction. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, defined as cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction/heart failure hospitalization at 1 year.

RESULTS

IMR and LVEDP were both measured in 131 patients (mean age 59±10.7 years, 103 [78.6%] male, 48 [36.6%] with anterior myocardial infarction). The median IMR was 29 (interquartile range, 17-55), the median LVEDP was 17 mm Hg (interquartile range, 12-21), and the correlation between them was not statistically significant (=0.15; =0.087). Fifty-three patients (40%) had low IMR (≤32) and low LVEDP (≤18), 18 (14%) had low IMR and high LVEDP, 31 (24%) had high IMR and low LVEDP, while 29 (22%) had high IMR and high LVEDP. Infarct size (% LV mass), LV ejection fraction, final myocardial perfusion grade ≤1, TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade ≤2, and coronary flow reserve were associated with LVEDP/IMR group, as was hospitalization for heart failure (n=18 events; =0.045) and major adverse cardiac events (n=21 events; =0.051). LVEDP>18 and IMR>32 combined was associated with major adverse cardiac events, independent of age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and infarct-related artery (odds ratio, 5.80 [95% CI, 1.60-21.22] =0.008). The net reclassification improvement for detecting major adverse cardiac events was 50.6% (95% CI, 2.7-98.2; =0.033) when LVEDP>18 was added to IMR>32.

CONCLUSIONS

IMR and LVEDP in combination have incremental value for risk stratification following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02257294.

摘要

背景

梗死相关动脉的微循环阻力指数(IMR)和左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)是行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的急性、预后生物标志物。IMR 和 LVEDP 联合的临床意义尚不清楚。

方法

在 T-TIME 临床试验(初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时低剂量辅助使用阿替普酶的试验)的一项预设子研究中,前瞻性测量了 IMR 和 LVEDP。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,使用压力和温度感应导丝测量 IMR。预先设定了 IMR(>32)和 LVEDP(>18mmHg)的预后界值。心肌梗死后 2 至 7 天和 3 个月进行对比增强心血管磁共振成像(1.5T)。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件,定义为 1 年时的心脏死亡/非致死性心肌梗死/心力衰竭住院。

结果

131 例患者(平均年龄 59±10.7 岁,103 例[78.6%]为男性,48 例[36.6%]为前壁心肌梗死)同时测量了 IMR 和 LVEDP。IMR 的中位数为 29(四分位距,17-55),LVEDP 的中位数为 17mmHg(四分位距,12-21),两者之间的相关性无统计学意义(=0.15;=0.087)。53 例(40%)患者 IMR 较低(≤32)且 LVEDP 较低(≤18),18 例(14%)患者 IMR 较低而 LVEDP 较高,31 例(24%)患者 IMR 较高而 LVEDP 较低,29 例(22%)患者 IMR 和 LVEDP 均较高。梗死面积(%左心室质量)、左心室射血分数、最终心肌灌注分级≤1、TIMI(血栓溶解心肌梗死)血流分级≤2 和冠状动脉血流储备与 LVEDP/IMR 组相关,心力衰竭住院(n=18 例事件;=0.045)和主要不良心脏事件(n=21 例事件;=0.051)也与 LVEDP/IMR 组相关。LVEDP>18 和 IMR>32 联合与主要不良心脏事件相关,独立于年龄、估计肾小球滤过率和梗死相关动脉(比值比,5.80[95%CI,1.60-21.22];=0.008)。当 LVEDP>18 时加入 IMR>32 后,检测主要不良心脏事件的净重新分类改善为 50.6%(95%CI,2.7-98.2;=0.033)。

结论

在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,IMR 和 LVEDP 联合具有额外的风险分层价值。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02257294。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验