Departamento de Lengua Española y Teoría de la Literatura, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Lenguas Aplicadas, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246933. eCollection 2021.
The present study is set to explore the way the orthographic distributional properties of novel written words and the number of exposures to these words affect their incidental learning in terms of recall and recognition. To that end, two experiments were conducted using videos with captions. These videos included written nonwords (orthographically marked language-specific items) and pseudowords (orthographically unmarked items) as captions paired to the spoken targets, presented either in isolation (Experiment 1) or within sentences (Experiment 2). Our results consistently show that items containing legal letter combinations (i.e., pseudowords) are better recalled and recognized than those with illegal combinations (i.e., nonwords). Further analysis in the recall task indicate that frequency modulates the learning of pseudowords and nonwords in a different way. The learning of pseudowords increases linearly with repetitions, while nonwords are equally learned across frequencies. These differential effects found in the recall task do not show up in the recognition task. Although participants took more time to recognize nonwords in the recognition task, increased exposure to the items similarly modulated reading times and accuracy for nonwords and pseudowords. Additionally, higher accuracy rates were found in Experiment 2, which underscores the beneficial effect of supportive visual information.
本研究旨在探讨新书面单词的正字法分布特性以及对这些单词的接触次数如何影响它们在回忆和识别方面的偶然学习。为此,进行了两项使用带字幕视频的实验。这些视频包括书面非词(正字法上标记为特定语言的项目)和假词(正字法上未标记的项目)作为字幕,与口语目标配对,分别在孤立状态下(实验 1)或在句子中呈现(实验 2)。我们的结果一致表明,包含合法字母组合的项目(即假词)比具有非法组合的项目(即非词)更容易被回忆和识别。在回忆任务中的进一步分析表明,频率以不同的方式调节假词和非词的学习。假词的学习随重复次数呈线性增加,而非词则在不同频率下均匀学习。在回忆任务中发现的这些差异效应在识别任务中并未出现。尽管参与者在识别任务中识别非词需要更多的时间,但对这些项目的更多接触同样会调节非词和假词的阅读时间和准确性。此外,在实验 2 中发现了更高的准确率,这强调了支持性视觉信息的有益效果。