• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化警察列队辨认中选择陪衬人的策略。

Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017292118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2017292118
PMID:33593908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7923643/
Abstract

A typical police lineup contains a photo of one suspect (who is innocent in a target-absent lineup and guilty in a target-present lineup) plus photos of five or more fillers who are known to be innocent. To create a fair lineup in which the suspect does not stand out, two filler selection methods are commonly used. In the first, fillers are selected if they are similar in appearance to the suspect. In the second, fillers are selected if they possess facial features included in the witness's description of the culprit (e.g., "20-y-old white male"). The police sometimes use a combination of the two methods by selecting description-matched fillers whose appearance is also similar to that of the suspect in the lineup. Decades of research on which approach is better remains unsettled. Here, we tested a counterintuitive prediction made by a formal model based on signal detection theory: From a pool of acceptable description-matched photos, selecting fillers whose appearance is otherwise dissimilar to the suspect should increase the hit rate without affecting the false-alarm rate (increasing discriminability). In Experiment 1, we confirmed this prediction using a standard mock-crime paradigm. In Experiment 2, the effect on discriminability was reversed (as also predicted by the model) when fillers were matched on similarity to the perpetrator in both target-present and target-absent lineups. These findings suggest that signal-detection theory offers a useful theoretical framework for understanding eyewitness identification decisions made from a police lineup.

摘要

一个典型的警察列队包含一张嫌疑犯的照片(在没有目标的列队中是无辜的,在有目标的列队中是有罪的),加上五张或更多的填充者的照片,这些填充者已知是无辜的。为了创建一个公平的列队,使嫌疑犯不突出,通常使用两种填充者选择方法。在第一种方法中,如果填充者与嫌疑犯外貌相似,则选择他们。在第二种方法中,如果填充者具有证人对罪犯描述中包含的面部特征(例如,“20 岁白人男性”),则选择他们。警方有时会结合这两种方法,选择描述相符且外貌与列队中的嫌疑犯相似的填充者。几十年来,哪种方法更好的研究仍未解决。在这里,我们测试了一个基于信号检测理论的正式模型提出的反直觉预测:从可接受的描述相符的照片中选择与嫌疑犯外貌不同的填充者,应该会在不影响虚报率(提高辨别力)的情况下提高命中率。在实验 1 中,我们使用标准的模拟犯罪范式证实了这一预测。在实验 2 中,当填充者在有目标和无目标列队中都与犯罪者的相似性相匹配时,对辨别力的影响被反转(这也与模型预测一致)。这些发现表明,信号检测理论为理解从警察列队中做出的目击者识别决策提供了一个有用的理论框架。

相似文献

1
Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups.优化警察列队辨认中选择陪衬人的策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017292118.
2
Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.怀疑目击证人列队辨认中的填充物相似性:文献综述与新方法
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000095. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
3
Modeling face similarity in police lineups.模拟警察列队中的面孔相似性。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;130(2):432-461. doi: 10.1037/rev0000408. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
4
The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.单一列队范式:一种在目击者识别实验中操纵目标存在的新方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000272.
5
Eyewitness Identification Is a Visual Search Task.目击证人辨认是一项视觉搜索任务。
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2021 Sep 15;7:519-541. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100119-124537. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观测量方法来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似性对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Oct 22;7(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00442-1.
7
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.嫌疑人与陪衬者之间的表型不匹配而非表型偏差会增加对黑人嫌疑人的目击证人指认。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1233782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233782. eCollection 2024.
9
The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification.填充物相似性和阵容大小对目击者识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Sep;50(9):1444-1462. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001342. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.基于新信号检测理论的证人列队表现框架。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;43(5):436-454. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000343. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-item signal detection theory model for eyewitness identification.一种用于目击证人识别的多项目信号检测理论模型。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 22;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00652-3.
2
New Insights on Expert Opinion About Eyewitness Memory Research.关于目击证人记忆研究的专家意见新见解。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Sep;20(5):903-924. doi: 10.1177/17456916241234837. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观指标来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似度对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Nov 6;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00522-w.
4
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观测量方法来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似性对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Oct 22;7(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00442-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.一种用于目击证人识别的感知标度方法。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 14;11(1):3380. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17194-5.
2
Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.收集和保存目击证人辨认证据的政策和程序建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;44(1):3-36. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000359.
3
Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.列队公平性:有利的异质性与诊断特征检测假说
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2019 Jun 13;4(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41235-019-0172-5.
4
Filler-Siphoning Theory Does Not Predict the Effect of Lineup Fairness on the Ability to Discriminate Innocent From Guilty Suspects: Reply to Smith, Wells, Smalarz, and Lampinen (2018).填充虹吸理论无法预测列队辨认公平性对区分无辜与有罪嫌疑人能力的影响:对史密斯、韦尔斯、斯马拉兹和兰皮宁(2018年)的回应
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1552-1557. doi: 10.1177/0956797618786459. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
5
The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.单一列队范式:一种在目击者识别实验中操纵目标存在的新方法。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Feb;42(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000272.
6
Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.不公正的阵容使证人更有可能混淆无辜和有罪的嫌疑人。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;27(9):1227-39. doi: 10.1177/0956797616655789. Epub 2016 Jul 24.
7
Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.怀疑目击证人列队辨认中的填充物相似性:文献综述与新方法
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Feb;39(1):62-74. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000095. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.一种基于信号检测的目击证人识别诊断特征检测模型。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;121(2):262-76. doi: 10.1037/a0035940.
9
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.目击者记忆的受试者工作特征分析:比较同时呈现和序列呈现组别的诊断准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Dec;18(4):361-76. doi: 10.1037/a0030609.
10
Selecting foils for identification lineups: matching suspects or descriptions?为辨认阵容挑选陪衬者:匹配嫌疑人还是描述?
Law Hum Behav. 2000 Apr;24(2):231-58. doi: 10.1023/a:1005463020252.