• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于信号检测的目击证人识别诊断特征检测模型。

A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.

作者信息

Wixted John T, Mickes Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;121(2):262-76. doi: 10.1037/a0035940.

DOI:10.1037/a0035940
PMID:24730600
Abstract

The theoretical understanding of eyewitness identifications made from a police lineup has long been guided by the distinction between absolute and relative decision strategies. In addition, the accuracy of identifications associated with different eyewitness memory procedures has long been evaluated using measures like the diagnosticity ratio (the correct identification rate divided by the false identification rate). Framed in terms of signal-detection theory, both the absolute/relative distinction and the diagnosticity ratio are mainly relevant to response bias while remaining silent about the key issue of diagnostic accuracy, or discriminability (i.e., the ability to tell the difference between innocent and guilty suspects in a lineup). Here, we propose a signal-detection-based model of eyewitness identification, one that encourages the use of (and helps to conceptualize) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to measure discriminability. Recent ROC analyses indicate that the simultaneous presentation of faces in a lineup yields higher discriminability than the presentation of faces in isolation, and we propose a diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis to account for that result. According to this hypothesis, the simultaneous presentation of faces allows the eyewitness to appreciate that certain facial features (viz., those that are shared by everyone in the lineup) are non-diagnostic of guilt. To the extent that those non-diagnostic features are discounted in favor of potentially more diagnostic features, the ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects will be enhanced.

摘要

长期以来,对于从警方列队辨认中得出的目击证人辨认结果的理论理解,一直受到绝对决策策略和相对决策策略之间差异的指导。此外,长期以来,与不同目击证人记忆程序相关的辨认准确性一直是使用诊断率(正确辨认率除以错误辨认率)等指标来评估的。从信号检测理论的角度来看,绝对/相对差异和诊断率主要与反应偏差相关,而对于诊断准确性或辨别力(即从列队辨认中区分无辜嫌疑人和有罪嫌疑人的能力)这一关键问题却未作探讨。在此,我们提出一种基于信号检测的目击证人辨认模型,该模型鼓励使用(并有助于概念化)接收者操作特征(ROC)分析来衡量辨别力。最近的ROC分析表明,在列队辨认中同时呈现面孔比单独呈现面孔具有更高的辨别力,我们提出一种诊断性特征检测假设来解释这一结果。根据这一假设,同时呈现面孔能让目击证人认识到某些面部特征(即列队中每个人都共有的那些特征)对于判定有罪并无诊断价值。只要那些无诊断价值的特征被忽略,转而关注可能更具诊断价值的特征,那么区分无辜嫌疑人和有罪嫌疑人的能力就会得到增强。

相似文献

1
A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification.一种基于信号检测的目击证人识别诊断特征检测模型。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;121(2):262-76. doi: 10.1037/a0035940.
2
Models of lineup memory.列队记忆模型。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep;105:81-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.为什么列队辨认优于单纯辨认?对填充虹吸和增强可辨别性解释的检验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2020 Mar;26(1):124-143. doi: 10.1037/xap0000218. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.目击者记忆的受试者工作特征分析:比较同时呈现和序列呈现组别的诊断准确性。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2012 Dec;18(4):361-76. doi: 10.1037/a0030609.
5
Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.序贯呈现阵容有助于减少有偏差的判断标准制定,但不能提高辨别力。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Jun;36(3):247-55. doi: 10.1037/h0093923.
6
fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves.fullROC:用于生成和分析目击者辨认程序 ROC 曲线的 R 包。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1259-1274. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01807-6. Epub 2022 May 31.
7
New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.基于新信号检测理论的证人列队表现框架。
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;43(5):436-454. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000343. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
ROC curve analyses of eyewitness identification decisions: An analysis of the recent debate.目击证人辨认决策的ROC曲线分析:对近期辩论的剖析
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2016;1(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41235-016-0006-7. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.使用信号检测模型估计列队辨认中有罪嫌疑人的比例和有罪的后验概率。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 May 13;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00219-4.
10
Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.使证人在列队辨认过程中积极探索面部特征并重新摆出研究-测试姿势,可提高辨别力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301845120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301845120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-item signal detection theory model for eyewitness identification.一种用于目击证人识别的多项目信号检测理论模型。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 22;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00652-3.
2
Masked face matching benefits from isolated facial features.蒙面人脸匹配受益于孤立的面部特征。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 1;20(7):e0326706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326706. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparing the strength of the confidence-accuracy versus response time-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification.比较目击证人识别中信心-准确性与反应时间-准确性关系的强度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 1;15(1):11064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96224-y.
4
Congruency effects and individual differences in masked face recognition under limited feature visibility.有限特征可见性下蒙面人脸识别中的一致性效应和个体差异。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01699-9.
5
Lineup position affects guessing-based selection but not culprit-presence detection in simultaneous and sequential lineups.排列位置会影响基于猜测的选择,但不会影响同时和连续列队中的嫌疑存在检测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 12;14(1):27642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78936-9.
6
The effect of lineup size on discriminability is dependent on filler similarity and independent of encoding strength.阵容规模对可辨别性的影响取决于填充项的相似性,且与编码强度无关。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1272-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01649-x. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.嫌疑人与陪衬者之间的表型不匹配而非表型偏差会增加对黑人嫌疑人的目击证人指认。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1233782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1233782. eCollection 2024.
8
The effects of non-diagnostic information on confidence and decision making.非诊断信息对信心和决策的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jul;52(5):1182-1194. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01535-6. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
9
Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.使用客观指标来检验嫌疑人和填充者相似度对目击者识别表现的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Nov 6;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00522-w.
10
Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.使证人在列队辨认过程中积极探索面部特征并重新摆出研究-测试姿势,可提高辨别力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301845120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301845120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.