Department of Surgery, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Phulbari-11, Pokhara, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2020 Apr-Jun;18(70):171-175.
Background Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis pose a diagnostic challenge. Various scoring systems have been designed to aid in the clinical assessment of these patients. Widely applied was Alvarado score and best performed in validating studies, but was observed with few drawbacks. Appendicitis inflammatory response (AIR) score was designed to overcome the drawbacks associated with the implementation of Alvarado scoring system. Objective The main objective of this study was to evaluate the Appendicitis inflammatory Response Score and compare its performance in predicting risk of appendicitis with the Alvarado score. Method Appendicitis inflammatory response score and Alvarado scores were calculated prospectively on patients suspected of acute appendicitis presenting to Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal between July 2017 and June 2019. Diagnostic performance of the two scores was compared. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 21 and p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Result The study included 217 patients with 109 (50.2%) males and 108 (49.8%) females. The mean age of patients was 25.77±15.54. The results analyzed showed better sensitivity of Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score (96.91%) as compared to 94.30% of Alvarado score. The positive and negative predictive values of Alvarado score were 74.87% and 50%, as compared to 79.70% and 72.20% for AIR score. Furthermore, the area under receiver operating curve of the appendix inflammatory response score was better (0.701) than that of Alvarado score (0.580). Conclusion Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) scoring performed well and more accurate than Alvarado scoring system with high specificity and high negative predictive value preventing negative appendectomies.
患有疑似阑尾炎的患者具有诊断挑战性。已经设计了各种评分系统来帮助对这些患者进行临床评估。广泛应用的是 Alvarado 评分,在验证研究中表现最佳,但观察到其存在一些缺点。设计阑尾炎炎症反应 (AIR) 评分是为了克服与 Alvarado 评分实施相关的缺点。目的:本研究的主要目的是评估阑尾炎炎症反应评分,并比较其在预测阑尾炎风险方面的性能与 Alvarado 评分。方法:前瞻性地对 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在尼泊尔博克拉的曼尼帕尔教学医院就诊的疑似急性阑尾炎患者计算阑尾炎炎症反应评分和 Alvarado 评分。比较两种评分的诊断性能。使用 SPSS 21 进行统计分析,p 值 <0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。结果:本研究共纳入 217 例患者,其中 109 例(50.2%)为男性,108 例(49.8%)为女性。患者的平均年龄为 25.77±15.54 岁。分析结果表明,与 Alvarado 评分的 94.30%相比,阑尾炎炎症反应评分的敏感性更好(96.91%)。Alvarado 评分的阳性和阴性预测值分别为 74.87%和 50%,而 AIR 评分的阳性和阴性预测值分别为 79.70%和 72.20%。此外,阑尾炎症反应评分的接收器工作曲线下面积(AUC)优于 Alvarado 评分(0.580)(0.701)。结论:阑尾炎炎症反应 (AIR) 评分的表现优于 Alvarado 评分系统,特异性高,阴性预测值高,可预防阴性阑尾切除术。