Tsao Chih-Hao, Yang Tang-Kai, Chen Kun-You, Fang Chan-En, Ueda Mitsuru, Richter Felix H, Janek Jürgen, Chiu Chi-Cheng, Kuo Ping-Lin
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
Rising Chemical Ltd. Co., Xiaogang District, Kaohsiung 81264, Taiwan.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 Mar 3;13(8):9846-9855. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c20657. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Two types of ion-conducting polyimides with sulfonate or ether functional groups were synthesized as ion-type or coordination-type cathode binders for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), respectively. Although superior ion transport abilities have been reported for both types of ion-conducting polymers, their electrochemical performances are significantly different and the corresponding transport mechanisms at the electrolyte/electrode interface remain elusive. Here, we combine experimental and computational techniques to investigate the cathode interface in the presence of both functional polymer binders in comparison with the poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) binder as reference. A broad shoulder in the cyclic voltammogram accompanied by a poor rate performance of battery tests was observed for a LiFePO cathode with coordination-type ether-based polyimide (EPI) binder. In contrast, a LiFePO cathode with ion-type sulfonated polyimide (SPI) binder exhibits smaller concentration polarization, achieving satisfactory capacity at high current density. Simulations show that the ether-based binder strongly coordinates Li ions and thus slows the diffusion of Li ions. This leads to the reduction of the LIB electrochemical performance at a high C-rate. In contrast, the negative moiety of the SPI binder leads to less localization of Li ions, allowing a slightly higher Li-ion mobility. Conventional PVDF shows no affinity to Li ions, leading to less Li-ion accumulation at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Yet, the cathode surface covered with PVDF shows the lowest Li-ion diffusivity compared to those with the two types of Li-ion-conducting binders. Therefore, cathodes with SPI and PVDF binders show less polarization at the electrode interface and allow higher C-rate performance of LIBs. The combined results provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of ion conduction in ion- and coordination-type Li-ion-conducting polymer binders. This gives valuable insight into the design of next-generation polymer materials for high-power LIBs.
合成了两种分别带有磺酸酯或醚官能团的离子导电聚酰亚胺,分别用作锂离子电池(LIB)的离子型或配位型阴极粘结剂。尽管已报道这两种离子导电聚合物都具有优异的离子传输能力,但它们的电化学性能却有显著差异,并且电解质/电极界面处相应的传输机制仍不清楚。在此,我们结合实验和计算技术,研究了在同时存在这两种功能性聚合物粘结剂的情况下的阴极界面,并与作为参考的聚偏二氟乙烯(PVDF)粘结剂进行了比较。对于采用配位型醚基聚酰亚胺(EPI)粘结剂的磷酸铁锂阴极,在循环伏安图中观察到一个宽肩峰,同时电池测试的倍率性能较差。相比之下,采用离子型磺化聚酰亚胺(SPI)粘结剂的磷酸铁锂阴极表现出较小的浓差极化,在高电流密度下能实现令人满意的容量。模拟结果表明,醚基粘结剂强烈配位锂离子,从而减缓了锂离子的扩散。这导致在高C倍率下LIB的电化学性能下降。相反,SPI粘结剂的负离子部分导致锂离子的局部化程度较低,使得锂离子迁移率略高。传统的PVDF对锂离子没有亲和力,导致电极/电解质界面处锂离子积累较少。然而,与两种锂离子导电粘结剂相比,覆盖有PVDF的阴极表面显示出最低的锂离子扩散率。因此,采用SPI和PVDF粘结剂的阴极在电极界面处极化较小,从而使LIB具有更高的C倍率性能。综合结果为离子型和配位型锂离子导电聚合物粘结剂中的离子传导机制提供了全面的理解。这为高功率LIB的下一代聚合物材料设计提供了有价值的见解。