Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Feb;23(1):31-42. doi: 10.1111/cid.12983. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
The overlying maxillary sinus frequently restrains the height of the posterior maxillary bones.
Evaluating the effect of downsizing the antrostomy side-window on the stability of the installed implants and vertical bone gain, after employing a graftless antral membrane balloon elevation (AMBE).
The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted on 20 patients with 30 deficient maxillary alveolar ridges underwent graftless (AMBE) after being allocated into a (5 mm) entry antrostomy group (the test group) and a (10 mm) entry antrostomy group (the control group) implementing a radiographic linear bone height and implant stability quotations (ISQ) comparison among both groups immediately after the placement of 38 Implants and 6 months after.
Radiographic bone gain of the test group (5.55 ± 0.93 mm) was significantly higher than the control group (2.86 ± 0.60 mm) (p <0.001). There was no significant difference in primary stability between the test (65 ± 5.32) and control groups (62.67 ± 4.46) (p = 0.202); while the test group (73.43 ± 4.39) showed significantly higher secondary stability than the control group (64.83 ± 6.05) (p <0.001). ISQ values recorded at 6 months were significantly higher than those recorded at insertion in the test group (p <0.001), while they were insignificant in the control group (p = 0.148).
Undersizing the antrostomy window deemed beneficial concerning the vertical bone gain and the simultaneously placed root form dental implants' secondary stability.
上颌窦的上方常常限制了后上颌骨的高度。
评估在使用无植骨的窦膜气球提升术(AMBE)后,缩小侧窦窗对安装种植体的稳定性和垂直骨增量的影响。
这是一项随机对照临床试验,共纳入 20 名上颌牙槽嵴缺损患者(30 个部位),随机分为 5mm 入口窦窗组(试验组)和 10mm 入口窦窗组(对照组)。两组患者均接受无植骨 AMBE 治疗。比较两组患者植入 38 颗种植体后即刻和 6 个月时的线性骨高度和种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)。
试验组的放射学骨增量(5.55±0.93mm)明显高于对照组(2.86±0.60mm)(p<0.001)。试验组(65±5.32)和对照组(62.67±4.46)的初始稳定性无显著差异(p=0.202);而试验组(73.43±4.39)的二次稳定性明显高于对照组(64.83±6.05)(p<0.001)。试验组 6 个月时的 ISQ 值明显高于植入时(p<0.001),而对照组则无显著差异(p=0.148)。
缩小窦窗尺寸有利于垂直骨增量和同时植入的根形种植体的二次稳定性。