Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan.
Department of Hematology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Ann Hematol. 2021 Apr;100(4):1065-1077. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04405-2. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
The phase 3 COLUMBA study demonstrated noninferiority of subcutaneous daratumumab (DARA SC) to intravenous daratumumab (DARA IV) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. We present a subgroup analysis of Asian patients from COLUMBA. Eligible patients had ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, or were double refractory. Co-primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and maximum trough concentration (C). Secondary endpoints included rates of infusion-related reactions, progression-free survival, and patient-reported satisfaction with therapy. Sixty-seven Asian patients (DARA SC, n = 30; DARA IV, n = 37) were randomized, including 42 Japanese patients (DARA SC, n = 18; DARA IV, n = 24). Comparable ORRs for DARA SC versus DARA IV were seen in the Asian cohort (66.7% vs 43.2%) and Japanese-only cohort (61.1% vs 54.2%), including patients weighing ≤ 65 kg. Similarity of C was seen in both Asian and Japanese-only cohorts; the ratio of the geometric mean of the C concentrations for DARA SC/DARA IV was 143.96% (90% confidence interval (CI), 112.03-185.00%) and 148.02% (90% CI, 113.32-193.34%), respectively. The Asian cohort (both treatment groups) and Japanese-only cohort (DARA SC group) experienced higher rates of grade 3/4 cytopenias compared with the global COLUMBA population, occurring predominantly in patients of low bodyweight; no patients discontinued treatment due to cytopenias. The Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire results generally favored DARA SC. In the Asian and Japanese-only cohorts, DARA SC was comparable to DARA IV. The efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety, and satisfaction results were generally consistent with the global COLUMBA population regardless of patient bodyweight. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03277105.
COLUMBA 研究的 3 期结果表明,在复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中,皮下注射达雷妥尤单抗(DARA SC)与静脉注射达雷妥尤单抗(DARA IV)相比非劣效。我们报告了 COLUMBA 亚洲患者的亚组分析结果。符合条件的患者既往接受过≥3 线治疗,包括蛋白酶体抑制剂和免疫调节剂,或为双重难治性患者。主要终点为总缓解率(ORR)和最大谷浓度(C)。次要终点包括输注相关反应发生率、无进展生存期和患者对治疗的满意度。67 例亚洲患者(DARA SC,n=30;DARA IV,n=37)被随机分组,其中 42 例为日本患者(DARA SC,n=18;DARA IV,n=24)。在亚洲队列和日本队列中,DARA SC 与 DARA IV 的 ORR 相当(66.7% vs 43.2%),包括体重≤65kg 的患者。在亚洲和日本队列中均观察到 C 的相似性;DARA SC/DARA IV 浓度几何均值比值分别为 143.96%(90%置信区间(CI),112.03-185.00%)和 148.02%(90%CI,113.32-193.34%)。亚洲队列(两组治疗)和日本队列(DARA SC 组)的 3/4 级血液学毒性发生率高于全球 COLUMBA 人群,主要发生在体重较低的患者中;无因血液学毒性而停止治疗的患者。癌症治疗满意度问卷结果普遍偏向 DARA SC。在亚洲和日本队列中,DARA SC 与 DARA IV 相当。无论患者体重如何,疗效、药代动力学、安全性和满意度结果通常与全球 COLUMBA 人群一致。临床试验标识符:NCT03277105。