Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2021 Jun;44(2):107-117. doi: 10.1037/prj0000461. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
This study evaluated correlates of mental health stigma among treatment providers, including whether provider attitudes, conceptualizations, and treatment recommendations regarding serious mental illness (SMI) may differ depending on client demographic characteristics. A total of 246 providers (medical students, psychology trainees, and licensed clinical psychologists) and 98 community members completed an online survey including measures of mental illness stigma and questions regarding a vignette of a person presenting to an emergency department (ER) with primary complaints of pain and a historical schizophrenia diagnosis. The vignette demographics were randomly varied using 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design including race (Black/White), housing status (housed/homeless), and criminal justice history (arrest/no arrest). Providers endorsed mental health stigma at varying levels compared with the community sample, with medical students demonstrating the highest stigma. Prior experience working with psychiatric populations was associated with lower stigma. Providers were more likely to conceptualize homeless ER presentations as potentially due to a lack of resources or substance dependence and were less likely to conceptualize ER presentations with arrest histories as pain related. Homeless vignettes were more likely to be referred for social services and vignettes with arrest histories were less likely to be referred for follow-up pain services. Findings suggest that individuals with SMI and additional marginalized identities likely experience exacerbated stigma within treatment settings, and this may also influence treatment decision-making. There is a need to consider intersectionality in future research and interventions for decreasing mental health stigma in healthcare settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究评估了治疗提供者心理健康污名的相关因素,包括提供者对严重精神疾病(SMI)的态度、概念化和治疗建议是否可能因客户人口统计学特征而异。共有 246 名提供者(医学生、心理学受训者和持照临床心理学家)和 98 名社区成员完成了一项在线调查,其中包括心理健康污名量表和关于一个人因主要抱怨疼痛和既往精神分裂症诊断而到急诊科就诊的个案报告的问题。使用 2×2×2 因子设计随机改变个案报告人口统计学特征,包括种族(黑/白)、住房状况(有房/无家可归)和刑事司法史(被捕/无被捕)。与社区样本相比,提供者对心理健康污名的认可程度存在差异,医学生表现出的污名程度最高。与精神科人群合作的既往经验与较低的污名相关。提供者更有可能将无家可归的急诊科就诊视为可能由于资源缺乏或物质依赖,而不太可能将有逮捕史的急诊科就诊视为与疼痛相关。无家可归的个案更有可能被转介到社会服务机构,而有逮捕史的个案则不太可能被转介到后续疼痛服务机构。研究结果表明,患有 SMI 及其他边缘化身份的个体在治疗环境中可能会经历更严重的污名化,这也可能影响治疗决策。在未来的研究和干预措施中,需要考虑交叉性,以减少医疗保健环境中的心理健康污名。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。