Wardrope Alistair, Jamnadas-Khoda Jenny, Broadhurst Mark, Grünewald Richard A, Heaton Timothy J, Howell Stephen J, Koepp Matthias, Parry Steve W, Sisodiya Sanjay, Walker Matthew C, Reuber Markus
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (AW, RAG, SJH, MR), Royal Hallamshire Hospital; Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology (JJ-K), University of Nottingham, Institute of Mental Health, Innovation Park; Mental Health Liaison Team (MB), Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Hartington Unit, Chesterfield; School of Mathematics and Statistics (TJH), University of Sheffield; Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy (MK, SS, MCW), University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology; NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Cellular Medicine (SWP), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne; and Academic Neurology Unit (MR), University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, United Kingdom.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;10(2):96-105. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000726.
Transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) is a common reason for presentation to primary/emergency care; over 90% are because of epilepsy, syncope, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Misdiagnoses are common, and there are currently no validated decision rules to aid diagnosis and management. We seek to explore the utility of machine-learning techniques to develop a short diagnostic instrument by extracting features with optimal discriminatory values from responses to detailed questionnaires about TLOC manifestations and comorbidities (86 questions to patients, 31 to TLOC witnesses).
Multi-center retrospective self- and witness-report questionnaire study in secondary care settings. Feature selection was performed by an iterative algorithm based on random forest analysis. Data were randomly divided in a 2:1 ratio into training and validation sets (163:86 for all data; 208:92 for analysis excluding witness reports).
Three hundred patients with proven diagnoses (100 each: epilepsy, syncope and PNES) were recruited from epilepsy and syncope services. Two hundred forty-nine completed patient and witness questionnaires: 86 epilepsy (64 female), 84 PNES (61 female), and 79 syncope (59 female). Responses to 36 questions optimally predicted diagnoses. A classifier trained on these features classified 74/86 (86.0% [95% confidence interval 76.9%-92.6%]) of patients correctly in validation (100 [86.7%-100%] syncope, 85.7 [67.3%-96.0%] epilepsy, 75.0 [56.6%-88.5%] PNES). Excluding witness reports, 34 features provided optimal prediction (classifier accuracy of 72/92 [78.3 (68.4%-86.2%)] in validation, 83.8 [68.0%-93.8%] syncope, 81.5 [61.9%-93.7%] epilepsy, 67.9 [47.7%-84.1%] PNES).
A tool based on patient symptoms/comorbidities and witness reports separates well between syncope and other common causes of TLOC. It can help to differentiate epilepsy and PNES. Validated decision rules may improve diagnostic processes and reduce misdiagnosis rates.
This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with TLOC, patient and witness questionnaires discriminate between syncope, epilepsy and PNES.
短暂性意识丧失(TLOC)是患者前往初级/急诊护理就诊的常见原因;超过90%的情况是由癫痫、晕厥或精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)引起的。误诊很常见,目前尚无经过验证的决策规则来辅助诊断和管理。我们试图探索机器学习技术的效用,通过从关于TLOC表现和合并症的详细问卷(向患者提出86个问题,向TLOC目击者提出31个问题)的回答中提取具有最佳鉴别价值的特征,来开发一种简短的诊断工具。
在二级护理机构中进行多中心回顾性自我报告和目击者报告问卷调查研究。通过基于随机森林分析的迭代算法进行特征选择。数据以2:1的比例随机分为训练集和验证集(所有数据为163:86;排除目击者报告的分析数据为208:92)。
从癫痫和晕厥服务机构招募了300例确诊患者(癫痫、晕厥和PNES各100例)。249例患者和目击者完成了问卷:86例癫痫(女性64例),84例PNES(女性61例),79例晕厥(女性59例)。对36个问题的回答能最佳地预测诊断。基于这些特征训练的分类器在验证中正确分类了74/86(86.0%[95%置信区间76.9%-92.6%])的患者(晕厥100例[86.7%-100%],癫痫85.7例[67.3%-96.0%],PNES 75.0例[56.6%-88.5%])。排除目击者报告后,34个特征提供了最佳预测(验证中分类器准确率为72/92[78.3(68.4%-86.2%)],晕厥83.8[68.0%-93.8%],癫痫81.5[61.9%-93.7%],PNES 67.9[47.7%-84.1%])。
基于患者症状/合并症和目击者报告的工具能很好地区分晕厥与TLOC的其他常见原因。它有助于鉴别癫痫和PNES。经过验证的决策规则可能会改善诊断过程并降低误诊率。
本研究提供了III类证据,即对于TLOC患者,患者和目击者问卷可区分晕厥、癫痫和PNES。