Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, 6650Ponce Health Sciences University/Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, PR 00732, USA.
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2021 May;246(9):1036-1044. doi: 10.1177/1535370221991094. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Biological therapies against breast cancer patients with tumors positive for the estrogen and progesterone hormone receptors and Her2 amplification have greatly improved their survival. However, to date, there are no effective biological therapies against breast cancers that lack these three receptors or triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). TNBC correlates with poor survival, in part because they relapse following chemo- and radio-therapies. TNBC is intrinsically aggressive since they have high mitotic indexes and tend to metastasize to the central nervous system. TNBCs are more likely to display centrosome amplification, an abnormal phenotype that results in defective mitotic spindles and abnormal cytokinesis, which culminate in aneuploidy and chromosome instability (known causes of tumor initiation and chemo-resistance). Besides their known role in cell cycle control, mitotic kinases have been also studied in different types of cancer including breast, especially in the context of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT is a cellular process characterized by the loss of cell polarity, reorganization of the cytoskeleton, and signaling reprogramming (upregulation of mesenchymal genes and downregulation of epithelial genes). Previously, we and others have shown the effects of mitotic kinases like Nek2 and Mps1 (TTK) on EMT. In this review, we focus on Aurora A, Aurora B, Bub1, and highly expressed in cancer (Hec1) as novel targets for therapeutic interventions in breast cancer and their effects on EMT. We highlight the established relationships and interactions of these and other mitotic kinases, clinical trial studies involving mitotic kinases, and the importance that represents to develop drugs against these proteins as potential targets in the primary care therapy for TNBC.
针对雌激素和孕激素激素受体以及 Her2 扩增阳性的乳腺癌患者的生物疗法极大地提高了他们的生存率。然而,迄今为止,针对缺乏这三种受体或三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的有效生物疗法还没有。TNBC 与生存率差有关,部分原因是它们在化疗和放疗后复发。TNBC 具有内在的侵袭性,因为它们具有较高的有丝分裂指数,并且倾向于转移到中枢神经系统。TNBC 更可能显示中心体扩增,这是一种异常表型,导致有丝分裂纺锤体缺陷和异常胞质分裂,最终导致非整倍体和染色体不稳定性(已知的肿瘤起始和化疗耐药原因)。除了它们在细胞周期控制中的已知作用外,有丝分裂激酶还在包括乳腺癌在内的不同类型的癌症中进行了研究,特别是在上皮-间充质转化(EMT)的背景下。EMT 是一种细胞过程,其特征是细胞极性丧失、细胞骨架重排以及信号重编程(间充质基因上调和上皮基因下调)。此前,我们和其他人已经表明有丝分裂激酶如 Nek2 和 Mps1(TTK)对 EMT 的影响。在这篇综述中,我们重点介绍 Aurora A、Aurora B、Bub1 和在癌症中高表达的(Hec1)作为乳腺癌治疗干预的新靶点及其对 EMT 的影响。我们强调了这些和其他有丝分裂激酶的既定关系和相互作用、涉及有丝分裂激酶的临床试验研究以及开发针对这些蛋白质的药物作为 TNBC 初级保健治疗潜在靶点的重要性。