Universitat d'Alacant (Spain).
Span J Psychol. 2021 Feb 19;24:e10. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.57.
The maladaptive nature of Perfectionistic Automatic Thoughts (PAT) increases the importance of evaluating the construct. This study aims to identify different clusters of PAT in undergraduates, and to check possible inter-cluster differences in the dimensions of dispositional empathy and emotional intelligence in a sample of 691 Spanish undergraduates (Mage = 23.1; SD = 5.26). The Perfectionism Cognitions Inventory, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale were used. Three clusters with low (LPAT), moderate (MPAT) and high (HPAT) levels of PAT were identified. Statistically significant differences were observed between these clusters in terms of dispositional empathy and emotional intelligence dimensions. HPAT significantly scored higher than LPAT on Fantasy, Empathic Concern, Personal Discomfort and Perception, as well as in comparison with MPAT on Fantasy, Empathic Concern, Personal Discomfort and Perception. Moreover, MPAT obtained significantly higher scores on Comprehension and Repair than LPAT. Effect sizes for these differences were of a small magnitude, except for the HPAT and LPAT contrasts, whose differences were of a moderate magnitude.
完美主义自动思维(PAT)的适应不良性质增加了评估该结构的重要性。本研究旨在确定大学生中不同的 PAT 集群,并在 691 名西班牙大学生样本中检查特质同理心和情绪智力的维度上可能存在的集群间差异(Mage = 23.1;SD = 5.26)。使用了完美主义认知问卷、人际反应性指数和特质元情绪量表。确定了具有低(LPAT)、中(MPAT)和高(HPAT)水平 PAT 的三个集群。这些集群在特质同理心和情绪智力维度上存在统计学上的显著差异。HPAT 在幻想、共情关注、个人不适和感知方面的得分显著高于 LPAT,与 MPAT 相比,在幻想、共情关注、个人不适和感知方面的得分也显著高于 MPAT。此外,MPAT 在理解和修复方面的得分明显高于 LPAT。这些差异的效应量较小,除了 HPAT 和 LPAT 之间的差异,其差异为中等大小。