Canga Mimoza, Malagnino Vito Antonio, Rroco Rosela, Xhemnica Lindita, Budina Rozarka, Çelaj Hava, Kurti Rezarta
Faculty of Public Health, "Ismail Qemali" University Vlore, Albania.
Endodontic Chair, University "Gabriele D'Annunzio" Chiety, Italy.
Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Dec;15(4):484-489. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.4.484.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate maintenance of the original anatomy of the root canal diameters instrumented with the Mtwo rotary instruments and BioRace file systems. Acrylic resin blocks with 160 simulated root canals with an angle curvature 15°-30° were taken into consideration in the present comparative study. The 160 simulated root canals were divided into two groups, each of them containing 80 acrylic resin blocks. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n=40 canals each). The simulated root canals subgroups were prepared with Mtwo and BioRace rotary nickel-titanium instruments. The results were scrutinized using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-test and Tukey's test. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. No significant difference was noted between the Mtwo rotary instruments and BioRace files as they both had equal value in the coronal section (P=.000) in S1 (D1) and S1 (Dpi). The results of Tukey's test revealed a significant difference between the Mtwo rotary instruments and BioRace files in middle and apical section with the value (P=.003) in S3 (Dpi) and S4 (Dpi). The results of Tukey's test found out a significant difference between the Mtwo rotary instruments and BioRace files in the middle and apical section with the respective values (P=.003) in S3 (Ai) and (P=.006) in S4 (Ai). Ccording to the findings of the present study, enlargement of the root canal diameters resulted to be better on the middle and apical section of the canal prepared with Mtwo instruments in comparison with BioRace instruments. Thus, Mtwo instruments will increase the rate of success of endodontic therapy.
本研究的目的是评估使用Mtwo旋转器械和BioRace锉系统预备后的根管直径原始解剖结构的维持情况。在本比较研究中,考虑使用带有160个模拟根管的丙烯酸树脂块,根管呈15°-30°角弯曲。160个模拟根管被分为两组,每组包含80个丙烯酸树脂块。每组又分为两个亚组(每组n = 40个根管)。模拟根管亚组分别用Mtwo和BioRace旋转镍钛器械进行预备。使用方差分析(ANOVA)检验和Tukey检验对结果进行仔细审查。显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。在S1(D1)和S1(Dpi)的冠部截面中,Mtwo旋转器械和BioRace锉之间未观察到显著差异,因为它们的值相等(P = 0.000)。Tukey检验结果显示,在S3(Dpi)和S4(Dpi)的中部和根尖部截面,Mtwo旋转器械和BioRace锉之间存在显著差异(P = 0.003)。Tukey检验结果还发现,在S3(Ai)的中部和根尖部截面以及S4(Ai)中,Mtwo旋转器械和BioRace锉之间存在显著差异,各自的值分别为(P = 0.003)和(P = 0.006)。根据本研究的结果,与BioRace器械相比,使用Mtwo器械预备的根管在中部和根尖部截面的根管直径扩大效果更好。因此,Mtwo器械将提高牙髓治疗的成功率。