Lin Andrew Y, Lupercio Florentino, Ho Gordon, Pollema Travis, Pretorius Victor, Birgersdotter-Green Ulrika
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Oct;1(4):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Transvenous lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) has been proven safe in the general patient population with the advances in extraction techniques. Octogenarians present a unique challenge given their comorbidities and the perceived increase in morbidity and mortality.
To assess the safety and outcomes of CIED extraction in octogenarians to younger patients.
We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared CIED extraction in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians. We separately assessed the rate of complete procedure success, clinical success, procedural mortality, major and minor complications. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The random effects model was used due to heterogeneity across study cohorts.
Seven studies with a total of 4,182 patients were included. There was no difference between octogenarians and non-octogenarians in complete procedure success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.02, p = 0.19) and clinical success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.01, p = 0.13). There was also no difference in procedural mortality (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.46 - 4.39, p = 0.54), major complication (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68 - 2.88, p = 0.36), and minor complication (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.90 - 2.29, p = 0.13).
In this study, there was no evidence to suggest a difference in procedural success and complication rates between octogenarians and younger patients. Transvenous lead extraction can be performed safely and effectively in the elderly population.
随着拔除技术的进步,经静脉拔除心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)在普通患者群体中已被证明是安全的。鉴于八旬老人的合并症以及其发病率和死亡率的明显上升,这一群体面临着独特的挑战。
评估八旬老人与年轻患者CIED拔除的安全性和结果。
我们对比较八旬老人与非八旬老人CIED拔除的研究进行了广泛的文献检索和系统评价。我们分别评估了完全手术成功率、临床成功率、手术死亡率、主要和次要并发症。风险比(RR)95%置信区间采用Mantel-Haenszel方法测量。由于各研究队列存在异质性,使用了随机效应模型。
纳入了7项研究,共4182例患者。八旬老人与非八旬老人在完全手术成功率(RR 1.01,95%CI 1.00 - 1.02,p = 0.19)和临床成功率(RR 1.01,95%CI 1.00 - 1.01,p = 0.13)方面没有差异。手术死亡率(RR 1.43,95%CI 0.46 - 4.39,p = 0.54)、主要并发症(RR 1.40,95%CI 0.68 - 2.88,p = 0.36)和次要并发症(RR 1.43,95%CI 0.90 - 2.29,p = 0.13)方面也没有差异。
在本研究中,没有证据表明八旬老人与年轻患者在手术成功率和并发症发生率上存在差异。经静脉导线拔除术在老年人群中可以安全有效地进行。