• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性

Safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly.

作者信息

Cao Junning, Liu Bo, Shi Jihang, Meng Xuan, Zhang Hangyu, Pan Yingwei, Lu Shichun

机构信息

Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):597-602. doi: 10.1111/ans.16656. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1111/ans.16656
PMID:33605041
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to retrospectively analyse the safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ALC) and identify risk factors for delayed discharge after ALC in the elderly.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who were scheduled to undergo ALC were assigned to the elderly group (age ≥ 65 years) or the non-elderly group. The primary outcome was postoperative discharge within 24 h (D24). Secondary outcomes were perioperative mortality, reasons for delayed discharge (psychosocial reasons (DP), complications (DC), drainage (DD) and conversion to open surgery (DCO)), intraoperative data and readmission within 30 days after discharge (readmission). Differences were statistically significant when P < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 7657 patients assigned to the elderly group (n = 1143) or the non-elderly group (n = 6514). The differences between elderly patients and non-elderly patients in the operation time (51.0 (37.0-70.0) versus 50.0 (35.0-65.0) min), blood loss (10.0 (5.0-10.0) versus 5.0 (5.0-10.0) mL), D24 (75.5% versus 81.7%) and DD (7.8% versus 3.2%) were statistically significant (P < 0.05, respectively). The differences between elderly patients and non-elderly patients in DP (8.2% versus 6.7%), DC (7.8% versus 7.9%), DCO (0.7% versus 0.5%) and readmission (0.5% versus 0.4%) were not statistically significant (P > 0.05, respectively). Independent risk factors for delayed discharge after ALC in the elderly were male sex, octogenarian status, prolonged operation time, arrhythmia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, a previous operation in the upper abdomen, acute inflammation of gallbladder and a gallbladder wall thicker than 3 mm (P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

ALC in the elderly is feasible and safe.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在回顾性分析非住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ALC)的安全性,并确定老年患者ALC术后延迟出院的危险因素。

方法

将计划接受ALC的连续患者分为老年组(年龄≥65岁)和非老年组。主要结局是术后24小时内出院(D24)。次要结局包括围手术期死亡率、延迟出院原因(心理社会原因(DP)、并发症(DC)、引流(DD)和转为开放手术(DCO))、术中数据以及出院后30天内再次入院(再入院)。当P<0.05时,差异具有统计学意义。

结果

共有7657例患者被分配到老年组(n = 1143)或非老年组(n = 6514)。老年患者与非老年患者在手术时间(51.0(37.0 - 70.0)对50.0(35.0 - 65.0)分钟)、失血量(10.0(5.0 - 10.0)对5.0(5.0 - 10.0)毫升)、D24(75.5%对81.7%)和DD(7.8%对3.2%)方面的差异具有统计学意义(P分别<0.05)。老年患者与非老年患者在DP(8.2%对6.7%)、DC(7.8%对7.9%)、DCO(0.7%对0.5%)和再入院(0.5%对0.4%)方面的差异无统计学意义(P分别>0.05)。老年患者ALC术后延迟出院的独立危险因素为男性、八十岁以上、手术时间延长、心律失常、2型糖尿病、上腹部既往手术史、胆囊急性炎症和胆囊壁厚度超过3毫米(P分别<0.05)。

结论

老年患者行ALC是可行且安全的。

相似文献

1
Safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly.老年患者门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Apr;91(4):597-602. doi: 10.1111/ans.16656. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Percutaneous gallbladder drainage for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的经皮胆囊引流术
Am J Surg. 2000 Feb;179(2):111-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00247-6.
3
Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory setting.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术在日间病房中的可行性和安全性。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019 Jun;18(3):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
4
Analysis of delayed discharge after day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy.日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术延迟出院分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:33-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.055. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution.在单一机构进行的早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Jan;12(1):74-80. doi: 10.1111/ases.12487. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
6
Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊引流术后早期计划性腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1704-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
7
Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.B超引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年高危急性胆囊炎的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 9;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0294-2.
8
Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be safety performed in the elderly?腹腔镜胆囊切除术能在老年人中安全实施吗?
Ann Ital Chir. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):21-4.
9
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients.肝硬化患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 Nov-Dec;44(18):1584-7.
10
Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in the current era of laparoscopic surgery.在当前腹腔镜手术时代,腹腔镜胆囊切除术向开腹胆囊切除术的转换。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1392-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A German's Perspective on the Way toward Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Postoperative Questionnaire.一位德国人对门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术之路的看法:一份术后调查问卷
Visc Med. 2025 Feb;41(1):14-20. doi: 10.1159/000541656. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
[Outpatient cholecystectomy as the next step? : Discussion and possible criteria in the selection of patients].[下一步是否进行门诊胆囊切除术?:患者选择中的讨论及可能标准]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;95(12):962-969. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02167-x. Epub 2024 Sep 5.