Huang Pin-Wen, Wang Cong-Zhi, Wu Qun-Yan, Lan Jian-Hui, Chai Zhi-Fang, Shi Wei-Qun
Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Laboratory of Nuclear Energy Chemistry, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dalton Trans. 2021 Mar 16;50(10):3559-3567. doi: 10.1039/d0dt04266h.
Mutual separation of trivalent americium (Am3+) and curium (Cm3+) ions through liquid-liquid extraction is challenging due to the similarity in their chemical properties. Three N, O combined extractants 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid di(N-ethyl-4-fluoroanilide) (Et(pFPh)DPA), diphenyl(2-pyridyl)phosphine oxide (Ph2PyPO), and alkyldiamide amine with 2-ethylhexylalkyl chains (ADAAM(EH)) have been identified to exhibit selectivity for Am3+ over Cm3+. In this work, the structures, bonding nature, and thermodynamic behaviors of a series of representative Am- and Cm-complexes with these ligands have been systematically investigated using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Based on our calculations, the ONO angle formed by three donor atoms of the ligand in the Am-complex is slightly larger than that in its Cm-analogue. The studied ligands show their preference toward Am3+ by opening their "mouths" slightly wider. According to the Mayer bond order and the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analyses, the interactions between the O donor atoms of these ligands and Am3+ and Cm3+ ions show some weak partial covalent character, and compared to the Am-O bond, there is relatively more covalency in the Cm-O bond in the corresponding complex. However, opposite results can be found in the Am-N and Cm-N bonding for the first two ligands. Particularly, for the better separation ligand ADAAM(EH), the Am-N and Cm-N interactions are extremely weak and no covalent character exists in the bonding. Nevertheless, the difference between the very weak Am-N and Cm-N interactions still leads to a better performance of ADAAM(EH). Based on the comparison of these ligands, we can find that weakening the binding ability of N atoms in the ligand may increase the difference between the Am-N and Cm-N interactions, thus enhancing the Am3+/Cm3+ separation ability of the ligand. Our study might provide new insights into understanding the selectivity of these three N, O combined ligands toward minor actinides and pave the way for designing efficient Am3+/Cm3+ extraction and separation ligands.
由于三价镅(Am3+)和锔(Cm3+)离子的化学性质相似,通过液-液萃取实现它们的相互分离具有挑战性。已确定三种N、O组合萃取剂,即2,6-吡啶二甲酸二(N-乙基-4-氟苯胺)(Et(pFPh)DPA)、二苯基(2-吡啶基)氧化膦(Ph2PyPO)和带有2-乙基己基烷基链的烷基二酰胺胺(ADAAM(EH)),对Am3+比对Cm3+具有选择性。在这项工作中,使用密度泛函理论(DFT)计算系统地研究了一系列具有这些配体的代表性Am-和Cm-配合物的结构、键合性质和热力学行为。基于我们的计算,Am-配合物中配体的三个供体原子形成的ONO角略大于其Cm类似物中的ONO角。所研究的配体通过稍微张大它们的“嘴”来显示出对Am3+的偏好。根据迈耶键级和分子中原子的量子理论(QTAIM)分析,这些配体的O供体原子与Am3+和Cm3+离子之间的相互作用表现出一些微弱的部分共价特征,并且与Am-O键相比,相应配合物中Cm-O键的共价性相对更强。然而,对于前两种配体,在Am-N和Cm-N键合中可以发现相反的结果。特别是,对于分离效果更好的配体ADAAM(EH),Am-N和Cm-N相互作用极其微弱,键合中不存在共价特征。尽管如此,非常微弱的Am-N和Cm-N相互作用之间的差异仍然导致ADAAM(EH)具有更好的性能。基于这些配体的比较,我们可以发现削弱配体中N原子的结合能力可能会增加Am-N和Cm-N相互作用之间的差异,从而提高配体的Am3+/Cm3+分离能力。我们的研究可能为理解这三种N、O组合配体对次锕系元素的选择性提供新的见解,并为设计高效的Am3+/Cm3+萃取和分离配体铺平道路。