Huang Pin-Wen, Wang Cong-Zhi, Wu Qun-Yan, Lan Jian-Hui, Song Gang, Chai Zhi-Fang, Shi Wei-Qun
Laboratory of Nuclear Energy Chemistry and Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018 Jan 3;20(2):1030-1038. doi: 10.1039/c7cp05381a.
Separation of trivalent actinides (An(iii)) and lanthanides (Ln(iii)) in spent nuclear fuel reprocessing is extremely challenging mainly owing to their similar chemical properties. Two amine-type reagents, tetrakis(2-pyridyl-methyl)-1,2-ethylenediamine (TPEN) and its hydrophobic derivative N,N,N',N'-tetrakis((4-butoxypyridin-2-yl)methyl)-ethylenediamine (TBPEN), have been identified to possess a selectivity for Am(iii) over Eu(iii). In this work, the structures, bonding nature, and thermodynamic behaviors of the Am(iii) and Eu(iii) complexes with these two ligands have been systematically studied via scalar relativistic density functional theory (DFT) calculations. According to Mayer bond order and the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analyses, interactions between the ligands and metal cations exhibit some degree of covalent character with relatively more covalency for Am(iii) complexes. In comparison with TPEN, TBPEN has better extractability but worse separation ability for Am(iii) and Eu(iii). Four nitrogen atoms in pyridine moieties may be responsible for the different extraction abilities of TPEN and TBPEN, while two nitrogen atoms in amine chains of these ligands appear to play more important roles in the separation of Am(iii)/Eu(iii). These different extraction behaviors may be attributed to the longer and thinner 'capsule' shaped TBPEN ligand compared to TPEN. Our study might provide new insights into understanding the selectivity of the amine-type ligands toward minor actinides, and pave the way for designing new TPEN derivatives for extraction and separation of An(iii)/Ln(iii).
在乏核燃料后处理中,三价锕系元素(An(iii))和镧系元素(Ln(iii))的分离极具挑战性,主要原因是它们具有相似的化学性质。已确定两种胺类试剂,四(2 - 吡啶基 - 甲基)-1,2 - 乙二胺(TPEN)及其疏水衍生物N,N,N',N'-四((4 - 丁氧基吡啶 - 2 - 基)甲基)-乙二胺(TBPEN),对Am(iii)比对Eu(iii)具有选择性。在这项工作中,通过标量相对论密度泛函理论(DFT)计算系统研究了Am(iii)和Eu(iii)与这两种配体形成的配合物的结构、键合性质和热力学行为。根据迈耶键级和分子中原子的量子理论(QTAIM)分析,配体与金属阳离子之间的相互作用表现出一定程度的共价特征,Am(iii)配合物的共价性相对更强。与TPEN相比,TBPEN对Am(iii)和Eu(iii)具有更好的萃取能力,但分离能力较差。吡啶部分的四个氮原子可能是TPEN和TBPEN萃取能力不同的原因,而这些配体胺链中的两个氮原子在Am(iii)/Eu(iii)的分离中似乎起着更重要的作用。这些不同的萃取行为可能归因于与TPEN相比,TBPEN配体呈更长更细的“胶囊”形状。我们的研究可能为理解胺类配体对次锕系元素的选择性提供新的见解,并为设计用于萃取和分离An(iii)/Ln(iii)的新型TPEN衍生物铺平道路。