Surgical Research Laboratory, Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Section of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Transplantation. 2022 Feb 1;106(2):308-317. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003698.
The specific effect of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver grafts on fibrinolysis, blood loss, and transfusion requirements after graft reperfusion is not well known. The aim of this study was to determine whether transplantation of controlled DCD livers is associated with an elevated risk of hyperfibrinolysis, increased blood loss, and higher transfusion requirements upon graft reperfusion, compared with livers donated after brain death (DBD).
A retrospective single-center analysis of all adult recipients of primary liver transplantation between 2000 and 2019 was performed (total cohort n = 628). Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics for DCD and DBD liver recipients (propensity score matching cohort n = 218). Intraoperative and postoperative hemostatic variables between DCD and DBD liver recipients were subsequently compared. Additionally, in vitro plasma analyses were performed to compare the intraoperative fibrinolytic state upon reperfusion.
No significant differences in median (interquartile range) postreperfusion blood loss (1.2 L [0.5-2.2] versus 1.3 L [0.6-2.2]; P = 0.62), red blood cell transfusion (2 units [0-4] versus 1.1 units [0-3]; P = 0.21), or fresh frozen plasma transfusion requirements (0 unit [0-2.2] versus 0 unit [0-0.9]; P = 0.11) were seen in DCD compared with DBD recipients, respectively. Furthermore, plasma fibrinolytic potential was similar in both groups.
Transplantation of controlled DCD liver grafts does not result in higher intraoperative blood loss or more transfusion requirements, compared with DBD liver transplantation. In accordance with this, no evidence for increased hyperfibrinolysis upon reperfusion in DCD compared with DBD liver grafts was found.
循环死亡(DCD)供体肝脏再灌注后对纤溶、失血和输血需求的具体影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定与脑死亡(DBD)供体肝脏相比,受控 DCD 供体肝脏移植是否与再灌注时纤溶过度、失血增加和输血需求增加相关。
对 2000 年至 2019 年间所有接受原发性肝移植的成年受者进行了回顾性单中心分析(总队列 n = 628)。使用倾向评分匹配来平衡 DCD 和 DBD 肝受者的基线特征(倾向评分匹配队列 n = 218)。随后比较 DCD 和 DBD 肝受者的术中及术后止血变量。此外,还进行了术中再灌注时血浆纤溶状态的比较。
再灌注后,DCD 与 DBD 肝受者之间的中位(四分位距)出血量(1.2 L [0.5-2.2] 与 1.3 L [0.6-2.2];P = 0.62)、红细胞输注(2 单位 [0-4] 与 1.1 单位 [0-3];P = 0.21)或新鲜冷冻血浆输注需求(0 单位 [0-2.2] 与 0 单位 [0-0.9];P = 0.11)均无显著差异。此外,两组的血浆纤溶潜能相似。
与 DBD 肝移植相比,受控 DCD 供体肝移植不会导致术中失血量增加或输血需求增加。与此一致,在 DCD 与 DBD 供体肝再灌注时没有发现纤溶过度增加的证据。