Kuske R R, Perez C A, Jacobs A J, Slessinger E D, Hederman M A, Walz B J, Kao M S, Camel H M
Radiation Oncology Center, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 May;14(5):899-906. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90012-0.
Between 1976 and 1982, 293 patients were treated for carcinoma of the uterine cervix at Washington University by definitive radiotherapy consisting of external beam therapy and two standard Fletcher-Suit applications (tandem plus vaginal colpostats). In ninety-nine patients (34%) mini-colpostats (MC) were used for one or both of their intracavitary insertions while 194 (66%) patients were treated twice with regular Fletcher-Suit colpostats (RC). The frequency of MC use was related to the age and parity of the patients. The distribution by stage of MC and RC groups was not significantly different. Pelvic failure in the MC group was similar to that of the RC group (21% vs 24%). Five-year disease-free survival was also similar between the two groups: 86% vs 80% Stage IB, 57% vs 61% Stage IIA, 47% vs 52% Stage IIB, and 27% vs 45% Stage III for MC and RC groups, respectively. The rate of major complications (grade 3) was 15% in the MC group and 8% in the RC group (p = 0.08). Careful phantom dosimetric studies in both types of colpostats and correlations of dose distributions at various points in the pelvis with frequency of rectal and bladder complications were carried out. The bladder and rectum received a 5-10% higher mean radiation dose (Gy) in the MC group than in the RC group despite lower overall exposure (milligram-hours). Thermoluminescent dosimetry in a polystyrene phantom demonstrates that approximately 10% higher doses are delivered to the bladder, rectum, and point A with an MC system as compared to an RC system, for constant exposure in mgh. Phantom measurements of a newer MC with bladder and rectal shielding demonstrate no influence on the bladder and rectal point dose at a source separation of 3 cm; midline points of the bladder and rectum are not within the full shadow of the shields even if the colpostats are flush with the tandem. Implications for therapy are discussed.
1976年至1982年间,华盛顿大学采用包括体外照射和两次标准的弗莱彻 - 休伊特施源器应用(串形施源器加阴道柱状施源器)的根治性放疗,治疗了293例子宫颈癌患者。在99例患者(34%)中,迷你柱状施源器(MC)用于一次或两次腔内植入,而194例(66%)患者则使用常规的弗莱彻 - 休伊特柱状施源器(RC)进行了两次治疗。MC的使用频率与患者的年龄和产次有关。MC组和RC组按分期的分布无显著差异。MC组的盆腔失败情况与RC组相似(21%对24%)。两组的五年无病生存率也相似:MC组和RC组的IB期分别为86%对80%,IIA期为57%对61%,IIB期为47%对52%,III期为27%对45%。MC组的主要并发症(3级)发生率为15%,RC组为8%(p = 0.08)。对两种类型的柱状施源器进行了仔细的体模剂量学研究,并将骨盆不同点的剂量分布与直肠和膀胱并发症的发生率进行了相关性分析。尽管总体照射量(毫克 - 小时)较低,但MC组膀胱和直肠接受的平均辐射剂量(戈瑞)比RC组高5 - 10%。在聚苯乙烯体模中的热释光剂量测定表明,对于相同的毫克 - 小时照射量,与RC系统相比,MC系统给予膀胱、直肠和A点的剂量大约高10%。对一种带有膀胱和直肠屏蔽的新型MC进行的体模测量表明,在源间距为3厘米时,对膀胱和直肠点剂量没有影响;即使柱状施源器与串形施源器齐平,膀胱和直肠的中线点也不在屏蔽的完全阴影范围内。讨论了对治疗的影响。