• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部大小、性别和年龄对听觉脑干反应的相对重要性。

The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response.

作者信息

Trune D R, Mitchell C, Phillips D S

机构信息

Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201.

出版信息

Hear Res. 1988 Feb-Mar;32(2-3):165-74. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90088-3.

DOI:10.1016/0378-5955(88)90088-3
PMID:3360676
Abstract

Correlations between the ABR (auditory brainstem response) and subject characteristics of gender, age, and head diameter were established in simple and multiple regression analyses of normal hearing individuals. The simple regression tests demonstrated that head diameter and gender were significantly correlated with the latencies and amplitudes of waves I, III, and V and the I-V and III-V interpeak intervals. In nearly all cases, head diameter correlated more highly with the ABR waves than did gender. Males had longer latencies than females with comparable head diameter, suggesting that factors other than head size are differentiating them. Age was significantly correlated only with the latency of wave III. All significant subject variables also were compared simultaneously in a multiple regression analysis to determine their order of significance and relative contributions to the ABR wave latencies. This permitted the establishment of regression equations for each wave latency to predict the ABR with measurable subject characteristics.

摘要

在对听力正常个体进行的简单和多元回归分析中,建立了听性脑干反应(ABR)与性别、年龄和头径等受试者特征之间的相关性。简单回归测试表明,头径和性别与I、III和V波的潜伏期和波幅以及I-V和III-V峰间期显著相关。在几乎所有情况下,头径与ABR波的相关性都高于性别。在头径相当的情况下,男性的潜伏期比女性长,这表明除头围大小外的其他因素导致了这种差异。年龄仅与III波的潜伏期显著相关。在多元回归分析中还同时比较了所有显著的受试者变量,以确定它们的显著性顺序以及对ABR波潜伏期的相对贡献。这使得能够为每个波潜伏期建立回归方程,以便根据可测量的受试者特征来预测ABR。

相似文献

1
The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response.头部大小、性别和年龄对听觉脑干反应的相对重要性。
Hear Res. 1988 Feb-Mar;32(2-3):165-74. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90088-3.
2
Variables affecting the auditory brainstem response: audiogram, age, gender and head size.影响听觉脑干反应的变量:听力图、年龄、性别和头围。
Hear Res. 1989 Jun 15;40(1-2):75-85. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90101-9.
3
Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response.以头围大小作为脑干听觉诱发电位潜伏期性别差异的基础。
Audiology. 1990;29(2):107-12. doi: 10.3109/00206099009081652.
4
Relationship between head size and latency of the auditory brainstem response.头部大小与听觉脑干反应潜伏期之间的关系。
Audiology. 1986;25(4-5):258-62.
5
Statistical dependence among the wave latencies of the auditory brain stem response.听觉脑干反应波潜伏期之间的统计依赖性。
Ear Hear. 1989 Oct;10(5):299-303. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198910000-00005.
6
Effects of age and sex on auditory brain stem response. A new aspect.年龄和性别对听觉脑干反应的影响。一个新的方面。
Scand Audiol. 1987;16(3):153-7. doi: 10.3109/01050398709042170.
7
Latency of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and head size. Evidence of the relationship by means of radiographic data.听觉脑干反应(ABR)潜伏期与头围。基于放射学数据的关系证据。
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988;30:219-23.
8
Effects of gender and head size on the auditory brainstem response.性别和头部大小对听觉脑干反应的影响。
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 1991;112(1):17-9.
9
Relationship between auditory brainstem response waveform and head size.听觉脑干反应波形与头部大小之间的关系。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1991;53(2):94-9. doi: 10.1159/000276196.
10
Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1981 May-Jun;90(3 Pt 1):236-40. doi: 10.1177/000348948109000308.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the lateralization of sustained electrophysiological response to 40 Hz clicks in typically developing preschoolers.正常发育的学龄前儿童对40赫兹滴答声持续电生理反应的偏侧化中的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08266-x.
2
Associations between physiological indicators of cochlear deafferentation and listening effort in military Veterans with normal audiograms.听力图正常的退伍军人中,耳蜗去传入神经支配的生理指标与听力努力之间的关联。
Hear Res. 2025 Jun;461:109263. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2025.109263. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
3
Deciphering Compromised Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility in Older Listeners: The Role of Cochlear Synaptopathy.
解读老年听众在噪声环境中言语清晰度受损的原因:耳蜗突触病变的作用。
eNeuro. 2025 Feb 20;12(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0182-24.2024. Print 2025 Feb.
4
Auditory brainstem responses as a biomarker for cognition.听觉脑干反应作为认知的一种生物标志物。
Commun Biol. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):1653. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07346-4.
5
Understanding Standard Procedure in Auditory Brainstem Response: Importance of Normative Data.了解听觉脑干反应的标准程序:规范数据的重要性。
J Audiol Otol. 2024 Oct;28(4):243-251. doi: 10.7874/jao.2024.00458. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Expression profiling of cochlear genes uncovers sex-based cellular function in mouse cochleae.耳蜗基因表达谱分析揭示了小鼠耳蜗中基于性别的细胞功能。
Hear Res. 2024 Jul;448:109030. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109030. Epub 2024 May 14.
7
The curvature quantification of wave I in auditory brainstem responses detects cochlear synaptopathy in human beings.听性脑干反应Ⅰ波的曲率定量检测人类的耳蜗突触病。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Sep;281(9):4735-4746. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08699-6. Epub 2024 May 4.
8
Comprehensive behavioral and physiologic assessment of peripheral and central auditory function in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury.对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的外周和中枢听觉功能进行全面的行为和生理评估。
Hear Res. 2024 Jan;441:108928. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108928. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
9
Associations Between Physiological Correlates of Cochlear Synaptopathy and Tinnitus in a Veteran Population.耳蜗突触病的生理相关因素与退伍军人人群耳鸣的相关性研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Nov 9;66(11):4635-4652. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00234. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
10
Latency and Interpeak Interval Values of Auditory Brainstem Response in 73 Individuals with Normal Hearing.73 例听力正常个体的听觉脑干反应潜伏期和峰间间期值。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Oct 20;28:e937847. doi: 10.12659/MSM.937847.