Suppr超能文献

早期气管切开术在脑卒中患者中的应用:一项荟萃分析及与晚期气管切开术的比较。

Early tracheostomy in stroke patients: A meta-analysis and comparison with late tracheostomy.

机构信息

Department of Research of IPSPAC, Instituto Paulista de Saúde para Alta Complexidade, 199 Padre Anchieta Avenue - Room 2, Jardim, Santo Andre, SP, 09090-710, Brazil.

Department of Research of IPSPAC, Instituto Paulista de Saúde para Alta Complexidade, 199 Padre Anchieta Avenue - Room 2, Jardim, Santo Andre, SP, 09090-710, Brazil; Institute of Neurology, University of São Paulo, 255 Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar avenue, Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 05403-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;203:106554. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106554. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Abstract

Tracheostomy (TQT) timing and its benefits is a current discussion in medical society. We aimed to compare the outcomes of early (ET) versus late tracheostomy (LT) in stroke patients with systematic review and meta-analysis, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Five hundred and nineteen studies were retrieved, whereas three were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. There were 5636 patients in the ET group (3151 male, 2470 female, 15 not reported - NR) and 7637 patients in the LT group (4098 male, 3542 female, and 33 NR). ET was significantly associated with fewer days in the hospital (weighted mean difference: -7.73 [95 % CI -8.59-6.86], p < 0.001) and reduced cases of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (risk difference: 0.71 [95 % CI 0.62-0.81], p < 0.001). There were no between-group statistical differences in intensive care unit stay duration, mechanical ventilation duration, or mortality. The findings from this meta-analysis cannot state that ET in severe stroke patients contributes to better outcomes when compared with LT. Scandalized assessments and randomized trials are encourage for better assessment.

摘要

气管切开术(TQT)时机及其益处是医学界目前正在讨论的话题。我们旨在根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,比较早期(ET)与晚期(LT)气管切开术在中风患者中的结果。共检索到 519 项研究,其中 3 项被选入系统评价和荟萃分析。ET 组有 5636 例患者(3151 例男性,2470 例女性,15 例未报告-NR),LT 组有 7637 例患者(4098 例男性,3542 例女性,33 例 NR)。ET 与住院天数减少显著相关(加权均数差:-7.73 [95 % CI -8.59-6.86],p < 0.001),呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生率降低(风险差:0.71 [95 % CI 0.62-0.81],p < 0.001)。两组在重症监护病房停留时间、机械通气时间或死亡率方面无统计学差异。这项荟萃分析的结果不能表明与 LT 相比,严重中风患者的 ET 会带来更好的结果。鼓励进行有争议的评估和随机试验,以进行更好的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验