Marra Annachiara, Vargas Maria, Buonanno Pasquale, Iacovazzo Carmine, Coviello Antonio, Servillo Giuseppe
Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", 80100 Naples, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 28;10(15):3319. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153319.
Tracheostomy can help weaning in long-term ventilated patients, reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay, and decreasing complications from prolonged tracheal intubation. In traumatic brain injury (TBI), ideal timing for tracheostomy is still debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of timing (early vs. late) of tracheostomy on mortality and incidence of VAP in traumatic brain-injured patients. This study was conducted in conformity with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We performed a search in PubMed, using an association between heading terms: early, tracheostomy, TBI, prognosis, recovery, impact, mortality, morbidity, and brain trauma OR brain injury. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of eligible studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Comparative analyses were made among Early Tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) groups. Our primary outcome was the odds ratio of mortality and incidence of VAP between the ET and LT groups in acute brain injury patients. Secondary outcomes included the standardized mean difference (MD) of the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. We included two randomized controlled trials, three observational trials, one cross-sectional study, and three retrospective cohort studies. The total number of participants in the ET group was 2509, while in the LT group it was 2597. Early tracheostomy reduced risk for incidence of pneumonia, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, but not mortality. In TBI patients, early tracheostomy compared with late tracheostomy might reduce risk for VAP, ICU and hospital LOS, and duration of mechanical ventilation, but increase the risk of mortality.
气管切开术有助于长期机械通气患者撤机,缩短机械通气时间和重症监护病房住院时间,并减少长期气管插管的并发症。在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中,气管切开术的理想时机仍存在争议。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估气管切开术时机(早期与晚期)对创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率的影响。本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。我们在PubMed中进行检索,使用的主题词关联为:早期、气管切开术、TBI、预后、恢复、影响、死亡率、发病率以及脑外伤或脑损伤。两名研究者使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)独立评估符合条件的研究的方法学质量。对早期气管切开术(ET)组和晚期气管切开术(LT)组进行了比较分析。我们的主要结局是急性脑损伤患者ET组和LT组之间死亡率和VAP发生率的比值比。次要结局包括机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间(LOS)和住院LOS的标准化均数差(MD)。我们纳入了两项随机对照试验、三项观察性试验、一项横断面研究和三项回顾性队列研究。ET组的参与者总数为2509人,而LT组为2597人。早期气管切开术降低了肺炎发生率、重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间和机械通气时间的风险,但未降低死亡率。在TBI患者中,与晚期气管切开术相比,早期气管切开术可能降低VAP、重症监护病房和住院LOS以及机械通气时间的风险,但会增加死亡风险。