• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希腊队列中新生儿早发性败血症的风险因素指导与凯撒永久败血症风险计算器的比较。

A comparison between risk-factor guidance for neonatal early-onset sepsis and Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in a Greek cohort.

机构信息

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Ioannina, School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2021 Apr;155:105331. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105331. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105331
PMID:33607601
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of neonates with early-onset sepsis (EOS) is based on maternal risk factors and infant clinical indications. An online sepsis risk calculator (SRC) has been established taking into consideration how clinical appearance modifies the initial risk for EOS.

AIMS

To compare our clinical practice based on risk-factor guidance with that projected through the application of the SRC.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

All neonates ≥34 weeks' gestation, during 01/2019-8/2020. The SRC was applied retrospectively to determine the recommendation. EOS was defined based on a positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture-proven infection within 72 h of age. Clinical sepsis was defined according to the European Medicine Agency criteria.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences on antibiotic administration and management.

RESULTS

Overall, 2084 infants were identified, of whom 150 (7%) received antibiotics. Of them, 34 infants were diagnosed with clinical sepsis, while one was diagnosed with culture positive-proven EOS. Applying SRC, 87 (4%) infants would have received antibiotics. Clinical sepsis was diagnosed in 29 infants, while one infant had culture positive-proven EOS. Sixty-seven of 150 (45%) infants that received antibiotics would not have been treated based on SRC; five infants that developed clinical sepsis would have been missed with SRC. A 99.7% agreement between both guidance was found regarding infants not indicated for antibiotics. SRC application led to an absolute reduction of antibiotic administration by 2.93% (95% CI 2.19-3.75), p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of SRC would have significantly reduced antibiotic usage; however, a significant portion of cases with clinical EOS would have been missed.

摘要

背景

早发性败血症(EOS)新生儿的治疗管理基于产妇危险因素和婴儿临床指征。考虑到临床外观如何改变 EOS 的初始风险,建立了一种在线败血症风险计算器(SRC)。

目的

比较我们基于危险因素指导的临床实践与通过应用 SRC 预测的结果。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

纳入所有胎龄≥34 周的新生儿,时间为 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 8 月。应用 SRC 回顾性确定建议。EOS 根据生后 72 小时内阳性血或脑脊液培养证实的感染定义。临床败血症根据欧洲药品管理局标准定义。

结果测量

抗生素使用和管理的差异。

结果

共有 2084 名婴儿被确定,其中 150 名(7%)接受了抗生素治疗。其中,34 名婴儿被诊断为临床败血症,1 名婴儿被诊断为培养阳性的 EOS。应用 SRC,87 名(4%)婴儿将接受抗生素治疗。29 名婴儿被诊断为临床败血症,1 名婴儿被诊断为培养阳性的 EOS。根据 SRC,150 名接受抗生素治疗的婴儿中有 67 名(45%)无需治疗;SRC 可能会错过 5 名患有临床败血症的婴儿。两种指南在不需要抗生素的婴儿方面有 99.7%的一致性。SRC 的应用使抗生素的使用绝对减少了 2.93%(95%CI 2.19-3.75),p<0.0001。

结论

采用 SRC 将显著减少抗生素的使用;然而,将有相当一部分患有临床 EOS 的婴儿被漏诊。

相似文献

1
A comparison between risk-factor guidance for neonatal early-onset sepsis and Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in a Greek cohort.希腊队列中新生儿早发性败血症的风险因素指导与凯撒永久败血症风险计算器的比较。
Early Hum Dev. 2021 Apr;155:105331. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105331. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Comparison of the management recommendations of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (SRC) with NICE guideline CG149 in infants ≥34 weeks' gestation who developed early-onset sepsis.比较 Kaiser Permanente 新生儿早发性败血症风险计算器(SRC)与 NICE 指南 CG149 在 ≥34 周胎龄发生早发性败血症的婴儿中的管理建议。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Nov;105(6):581-586. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317165. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Potential benefit from the implementation of the Kaiser Permanente neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on clinical management of neonates with presumed sepsis.实施凯撒永久新生儿早发性败血症计算器对疑似败血症新生儿临床管理的潜在益处。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Mar;181(3):1001-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04282-x. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
4
Comparison of NICE Guideline CG149 and the Sepsis Risk Calculator for the Management of Early-Onset Sepsis on the Postnatal Ward.比较 NICE 指南 CG149 和脓毒症风险计算器在新生儿病房管理早发性脓毒症的应用。
Neonatology. 2021;118(5):562-568. doi: 10.1159/000518059. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
5
Comparison of diagnoses of early-onset sepsis associated with use of Sepsis Risk Calculator versus NICE CG149: a prospective, population-wide cohort study in London, UK, 2020-2021.比较使用 Sepsis Risk Calculator 和 NICE CG149 诊断早发性败血症的诊断结果:英国伦敦 2020-2021 年的一项前瞻性、全人群队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 27;13(7):e072708. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072708.
6
Screening for early onset neonatal sepsis: NICE guidance-based practice versus projected application of the Kaiser Permanente sepsis risk calculator in the UK population.早发型新生儿败血症筛查:基于 NICE 指南的实践与 Kaiser Permanente 败血症风险计算器在英国人群中的预计应用比较。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):118-122. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316777. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
7
Application of Kaiser Sepsis Calculator in culture-positive infants with early onset sepsis.Kaiser 脓毒症计算器在血培养阳性的早发型脓毒症婴儿中的应用。
World J Pediatr. 2021 Aug;17(4):429-433. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00446-9. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
Neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator: Impact on antibiotic use in a level II neonatal unit in Western Australia.新生儿早发性败血症计算器:对西澳大利亚二级新生儿单位抗生素使用的影响。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2024 Jan;65(1):71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.04.010. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
9
Implementation of the Neonatal Sepsis Calculator in Early-Onset Sepsis and Maternal Chorioamnionitis.新生儿脓毒症计算器在早发型脓毒症和产妇绒毛膜羊膜炎中的应用
Adv Neonatal Care. 2020 Feb;20(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000668.
10
Ensuring a Locally Tailored Response to Early Onset Sepsis Screening Meets or Exceeds the Performance of Published Approaches.确保对早发性脓毒症筛查进行因地制宜的应对,其效果达到或超过已发表方法的表现。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Oct;10(10):877-883. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0153.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and economic impacts of a modified-observational screening approach to well-appearing infants born to mothers with chorioamnionitis.母亲患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的外观正常婴儿改良观察性筛查方法的临床和经济影响。
J Perinatol. 2024 Jul;44(7):1042-1049. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01858-3. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
2
Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Rational Use of Antibiotics in Neonatal Sepsis.新生儿重症监护病房的抗菌药物耐药性防治:新生儿脓毒症中抗生素的合理使用
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;12(3):508. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030508.
3
Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Infections in the NICUs and Methods to Combat It.
新生儿重症监护病房中的抗生素耐药性与生物膜感染及其应对方法
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;12(2):352. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020352.
4
Agreement between an Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator and the Colombian Clinical Practice Guideline in Three Tertiary-Care Centers in Bogotá, Colombia.哥伦比亚波哥大三所三级护理中心的早发性新生儿败血症风险计算器与哥伦比亚临床实践指南的一致性。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1197-e1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2001-9012. Epub 2022 Dec 20.