Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Oral Oncol. 2021 Apr;115:105222. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105222. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
There is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients.
Thirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0.
82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0-8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9-49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7-87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1-5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5-8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353-622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428-7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases).
Our data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.
对于一线化疗后复发转移性鼻咽癌(rmNPC),尚无标准治疗方法。本研究报道了阿帕替尼在 rmNPC 患者中的疗效和安全性数据。
35 例经活检证实的 rmNPC 患者在同情准入计划下接受 500mg/天的阿帕替尼治疗。主要终点为客观缓解率(ORR;RECIST v1.1)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用 CTCAE v4.0 评估毒性。
82.9%(29/35)的患者为多部位转移性 rmNPC。除 5 例患者外,所有患者均对铂类耐药;37.1%(13/35)患者接受了≥2线治疗。阿帕替尼治疗的中位周期数为 4.0(IQR:2.0-8.0)。ORR 为 31.4%(11/35[95%CI:16.9-49.3]),疾病控制率为 74.3%(26/35[95%CI:56.7-87.5]);11 名(31.4%)和 4 名(11.4%)患者的缓解时间分别≥6 个月和≥12 个月。中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 3.9(95%CI:3.1-5.5)个月和 5.8(95%CI:4.5-8.0)个月。在≥12 个月的应答者中,所有患者的阿帕替尼治疗前 EBV DNA 滴度均<700(范围:353-622)拷贝/ml;这与 PFS 与阿帕替尼治疗前 EBV DNA 滴度有关(调整后的 HR 为 3.364[95%CI:1.428-7.923],≥4000 拷贝/ml,P=0.006)。42.9%(15/35)的患者需要减少剂量。尽管如此,仅有 5 名(14.3%)患者发生 3 级毒性(2 例血液学毒性,1 例高血压,1 例手足综合征,1 例转氨酶升高)。
我们的数据提示阿帕替尼在 rmNPC 患者中具有潜在疗效。尽管严重毒性的发生率较低,但仍有 42.9%的患者需要调整剂量。