• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助产伦理教育的基本要素:德尔菲研究的结果。

Essential components of midwifery ethics education: results of a Delphi study.

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Nurse-Midwifery, School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland OR 97239.

Professor, School of Nursing and Department of Women's Studies and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 400 North Ingalls Suite 3160 Ann Arbor Michigan 48103.

出版信息

Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102946. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102946. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2021.102946
PMID:33610063
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ethical dilemmas are an inevitable part of a midwife's experience in clinical care. Midwifery educational programs have an obligation to provide students the opportunities to acquire the skills and knowledge to recognize and negotiate ethical dilemmas. Implementation of strategies for imparting ethical competencies and clinical ethics decision-making skills in formal midwifery curricula have been challenging and inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to gather information and opinions from midwifery educators and clinical preceptors about the essential components of ethics education for midwifery students in the United States (U.S.), aiming for consensus on key content, competencies, learning outcomes, and teaching strategies.

DESIGN

This is an online Delphi study conducted in three rounds. Round 1 consisted of open-ended questions to explore and identify key content, competencies, learning outcomes, and teaching strategies for midwifery ethics education. In Rounds 2 and 3, experts rated statements on a 1 to 7 Likert scale, with positive consensus defined as 70% or more of the experts scoring ≥6.

PARTICIPANTS

The panel included midwifery educators (midwifery program directors, faculty, and clinical preceptors) from the United States.

FINDINGS

Of the 12 statements on key content of ethics education, midwives emphasized that content promoting an understanding of shared decision-making is essential for inclusion. Of the statements regarding competencies, learning outcomes, and teaching strategies, 20 of 21 statements met consensus, including those related to shared decision-making and ethical decision-making, as well as attributes such as compassion and courage. Midwives did not agree that an essential teaching strategy includes a validated assessment tool for evaluating students on any component of ethics learning (knowledge, skills, behaviour).

KEY CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi study reveals what midwifery educators consider essential components of ethics education for midwifery students, with a particular focus on the professional attributes of shared decision-making.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Initial insights about optimal ways to incorporate the essential ethics education components into midwifery program curricula are provided, and more research is needed.

摘要

目的

伦理困境是助产士在临床护理中经验的必然组成部分。助产教育计划有义务为学生提供获得识别和协商伦理困境的技能和知识的机会。在正式的助产学课程中实施传授伦理能力和临床伦理决策技能的策略一直具有挑战性和不一致性。本研究的目的是从助产教育者和临床导师那里收集有关美国(美国)助产学生伦理教育基本要素的信息和意见,旨在就关键内容、能力、学习成果和教学策略达成共识。

设计

这是一项在线德尔菲研究,分三轮进行。第一轮包括开放式问题,旨在探索和确定助产伦理教育的关键内容、能力、学习成果和教学策略。在第二轮和第三轮中,专家对陈述进行了 1 到 7 的李克特量表评分,正面共识定义为 70%或以上的专家评分≥6。

参与者

该小组包括来自美国的助产教育者(助产项目主任、教师和临床导师)。

结果

在伦理教育的关键内容的 12 个陈述中,助产士强调,促进对共同决策的理解的内容对于包含在内至关重要。在关于能力、学习成果和教学策略的陈述中,21 个陈述中有 20 个达成共识,包括与共同决策和伦理决策以及同情和勇气等属性相关的陈述。助产士不同意一个基本的教学策略包括一个验证的评估工具,用于评估学生在任何伦理学习组成部分(知识、技能、行为)上的表现。

主要结论

这项德尔菲研究揭示了助产教育者认为助产学生伦理教育的基本组成部分,特别关注共同决策的专业属性。

实践意义

提供了有关将基本伦理教育要素纳入助产计划课程的最佳方式的初步见解,需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Essential components of midwifery ethics education: results of a Delphi study.助产伦理教育的基本要素:德尔菲研究的结果。
Midwifery. 2021 May;96:102946. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102946. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
"I'm sure we talked about it": Midwives experiences of ethics education and ethical dilemmas, a qualitative study.“我确定我们讨论过这个问题”:助产士的伦理教育和伦理困境体验,一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2020 Nov;33(6):e519-e526. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care.友好关系:一项关于产科护理中共同决策的德尔菲研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 9;14:223. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-223.
4
Midwifery students' expectations of and experiences with ethics education: A qualitative study.助产学学生对伦理教育的期望和体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105035. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105035. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
5
Mapping of Iranian midwifery curriculum according to the International Confederation of midwives competencies.伊朗产科学课程设置与国际助产士联盟能力框架映射。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04755-7.
6
An online Delphi study to investigate the completeness of the CanMEDS Roles and the relevance, formulation, and measurability of their key competencies within eight healthcare disciplines in Flanders.一项在线德尔菲研究,旨在调查 CanMEDS 角色在佛兰德八个医疗保健学科中的完整性,以及其关键能力的相关性、表述和可衡量性。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 10;22(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03308-8.
7
Simulation: a new approach to teaching ethics.模拟:一种新的伦理教学方法。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;60(1):70-4. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12185. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
8
Ethics Education in Midwifery Education Programs in the United States.美国助产士教育项目中的伦理教育
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Sep;61(5):586-592. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12462. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Capacity building of skilled birth attendants: a review of pre-service education curricula.熟练助产士的能力建设:对岗前教育课程的回顾。
Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):e64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical dilemmas experienced by midwives in their professional practice in Northwestern Ethiopia: a phenomenological interview study.埃塞俄比亚西北部助产士在其专业实践中遇到的伦理困境:一项现象学访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01266-6.
2
Development of core competency evaluation index system for informatics nurses in China: a Delphi study.中国信息化护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建:一项德尔菲研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e091750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091750.
3
Construction of an evaluation index system for undergraduate nursing teachers' curriculum humanistic competence: a Delphi study in China.
本科护理教师课程人文能力评价指标体系的构建:一项中国的德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 25;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01432-4.
4
Health literate-sensitive shared decision-making in maternity care: needs for support among maternity care professionals in the Netherlands.孕产保健中的健康素养敏感型共享决策:荷兰孕产保健专业人员的支持需求。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 21;23(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05915-9.