Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
J Commun Disord. 2021 Mar-Apr;90:106090. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106090. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Prior speech entrainment studies, where individuals with non-fluent aphasia mimic an audio-visual model, suggest speech entrainment improves speech fluency, as indexed by various linguistic measures (e.g., the total number of different words produced per minute). Here, more precise speech timing adjustments accompanying entrained speech were studied and compared to spontaneous speech to determine how these temporal variables relate to the fluency inducing effects of speech entrainment in aphasia.
Thirty-one left hemisphere stroke survivors classified with fluent or non-fluent speech were audio-video recorded as they described a picture and during speech entrainment. Speech fluency was documented using the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised. Acoustic measures of speech timing included total number of syllables, speech rate, articulatory rate, silent pause frequency and duration. Standard descriptive statistics and a two-factor mixed model analysis of variance were used to investigate group, task, and 'group x task' interaction effects.
All acoustic measures of speech timing differentiated the fluent and nonfluent groups except for silent pause frequency. Differences between speech entrainment and spontaneous speech were found for most acoustic measures of speech timing and speaker groups, yet the direction of the effect varied. Stroke survivors classified with non-fluent aphasia improved speech fluency such that speech entrainment elicited pause adjustments facilitating more typical speech timing in comparison to spontaneous speech.
Overall, findings provide further evidence of the impact of speech entrainment on measures of speech timing to help individuals with non-fluent aphasia to practice speaking more fluently. Practicing speaking more fluently may ultimately impact perceptual judgments of speech naturalness and social acceptance for persons with aphasia.
先前的言语跟随研究中,非流利型失语症患者模仿视听模型,表明言语跟随可以提高言语流畅性,这可以通过各种语言测量指标(例如,每分钟产生的不同单词总数)来衡量。在这里,研究了更精确的伴随跟随言语的言语时间调整,并将其与自发言语进行了比较,以确定这些时间变量如何与失语症中的言语跟随的流畅性诱导作用相关。
31 名左侧半球中风幸存者被分类为流利或非流利言语,并在描述图片和言语跟随时进行音频-视频记录。使用西方失语症电池修订版记录言语流畅性。言语时间的声学测量包括音节总数、言语率、发音率、无声停顿频率和时长。使用标准描述性统计和两因素混合模型方差分析来研究组、任务和“组 x 任务”交互效应。
除了无声停顿频率外,所有言语时间的声学测量都可以区分流利和非流利组。大多数声学言语时间测量和说话者组都发现了言语跟随和自发言语之间的差异,但效应的方向有所不同。被分类为非流利型失语症的中风幸存者提高了言语流畅性,使得言语跟随诱发了停顿调整,从而使言语时间更接近典型。
总的来说,这些发现提供了更多的证据表明言语跟随对言语时间测量的影响,有助于非流利型失语症患者更流利地练习说话。更流利地说话最终可能会影响对言语自然度和失语症患者的社会接受度的感知判断。