Cardiothoracic Department, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Cardiothoracic Department, Brussels University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun 28;33(1):34-42. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab047.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the lesion size and depth of radiofrequency (RF) ablation in a simultaneous biparietal bidirectional bipolar (SBB) approach, compared to a simultaneous and staged unipolar and uniparietal bipolar setup [simultaneous uniparietal bipolar (SiUB) and staged uniparietal bipolar (StUB), respectively].
Fresh left atrial porcine tissue was mounted into the ABLA-BOX simulator. Different ablation approaches were tested: (i) SBB: a concept consisting of SBB endo-epicardial ablation, (ii) SiUB: simultaneous epicardial uniparietal bipolar and endocardial unipolar ablation and (iii) StUB: staged epicardial uniparietal bipolar and endocardial unipolar ablation. In the StUB setup, a 1-h interval between the epi-endo ablation was respected.
Transmural lesions were present in 90% of the bipolar biparietal ablations, yet no full transmurality was observed in the simultaneous nor in the staged unipolar with uniparietal bipolar ablation group. In SBB, the area and volume of the ablation lesions were smaller (523.33 mm2/mm and 52.33 mm3/mm, respectively) than in SiUB (588.17 mm2/mm and 58.81 mm3/mm, respectively) and StUB (583.76 mm2/mm and 58.37 mm3/mm, P = 0.044). Also, in SBB, the overall, epicardial and endocardial maximum diameters of the lesions (1.59, 1.57 and 1.52 mm; respectively) were smaller than in SiUB (2.38, 2.26 and 2.33 mm; respectively) and in StUB (2.36, 2.28 and 2.14 mm; respectively, all P < 0.001).
Although bipolar biparietal bidirectional RF ablation results in smaller lesions than uniparietal bipolar and unipolar ablation, their capacity to penetrate the tissue is much higher. Moreover, in uniparietal RF applications, the energy spreads in the superficial layers of the tissue but fails to penetrate. Therefore, the degree of transmurality is much higher when using such a 'truly bipolar' ablation approach.
本研究旨在评估射频(RF)消融的病变大小和深度,采用双侧壁双向双极(SBB)方法,与同时和分期的单极和单极双极方法[分别为同时单极双极(SiUB)和分期单极双极(StUB)]进行比较。
将新鲜的左心房猪组织安装在 ABLA-BOX 模拟器中。测试了不同的消融方法:(i)SBB:一种由 SBB 心外膜-心内膜消融组成的概念,(ii)SiUB:同时心外膜单极双极和心内膜单极消融,(iii)StUB:分期心外膜单极双极和心内膜单极消融。在 StUB 方案中,心外膜-心内膜消融之间间隔 1 小时。
在 90%的双极双侧消融中存在透壁性病变,但在同时或分期的单极和单极双极消融组中均未观察到完全透壁性。在 SBB 中,消融病变的面积和体积小于 SiUB(分别为 523.33 mm2/mm 和 52.33 mm3/mm)和 StUB(分别为 588.17 mm2/mm 和 58.81 mm3/mm,P=0.044)。此外,在 SBB 中,病变的总直径、心外膜和心内膜最大直径(分别为 1.59、1.57 和 1.52 mm)均小于 SiUB(分别为 2.38、2.26 和 2.33 mm)和 StUB(分别为 2.36、2.28 和 2.14 mm,均 P<0.001)。
虽然双极双侧双向 RF 消融导致的病变小于单极双极和单极消融,但它们穿透组织的能力要高得多。此外,在单极 RF 应用中,能量在组织的浅层传播,但无法穿透。因此,采用这种“真正的双极”消融方法时,透壁程度要高得多。